Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DADASAHEB KUSHABAPU PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
Withdrawn

Holding

The petition stands withdrawn and is disposed of with the liberty to initiate prosecution as sought by the petitioner.

Summary

Petitioner Dadasaheb Kushabapu Pawar filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 280 of 2022 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking the withdrawal of the petition and liberty to initiate prosecution against certain persons under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code or an equivalent provision in the BNSS, 2023. The petitioner, through counsel Ajinkya Kale, requested that the court allow the withdrawal and grant the said liberty. The respondents, represented by N. B. Patil, opposed the request. The Bench consisting of Justices Sandipkumar C. More and Vaishali Patil-Jadhav considered whether the petition could be withdrawn and the liberty granted. The court held that the petition could indeed be withdrawn and disposed of with the liberty sought. Consequently, the petition was formally withdrawn and disposed of as per the petitioner’s request.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal writ petition may be withdrawn at the petitioner's request and the court may grant liberty to initiate prosecution under Section 156(3) CrPC or an equivalent provision in the BNSS, 2023?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Criminal Procedure
  • Section 156(3)
  • withdrawal of petition
  • prosecution
  • High Court
  • Writ Petition

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:41755-DB


                                           1                  920 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 280 OF 2022



                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                         920 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 280 OF 2022

                              DADASAHEB KUSHABAPU PAWAR
                                           VERSUS
                       THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                             ...
            Adv. Ajinkya Kale h/f Adv. Talekar And Associates, Advocate for the
            Petitioner
            Adv. N. B. Patil, APP for Respondents-State
                                             ...

                                       CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                               VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                       DATED : 09/09/2026
            Per Court:

            .          Heard.


            2.         The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks

            withdrawal of the petition and the liberty to initiate the prosecution

            of the concerned persons by invoking Sections 156 (3) of Cr. P. C.

            or any equivalent Section of the BNSS, 2023.


            3.         In view of the same, the petition stands withdrawn and

            disposed of with liberty as sought.




            ( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. )

            shivani/


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.