Bombay High Court

SARALA TUKARAM CHAUDHARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court held that, having been satisfied that the petitioner's grievance was resolved, the writ petitions were withdrawn and disposed of.

Summary

Sarala Tukaram Chaudhri filed two writ petitions (Nos. 2853/2013 and 2837/2013) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Madhav M. Bhokarikar, while the State was represented by Mr. R. B. Dhaware and the second respondent by Mr. Ujwal Subhash Patil. The court, after hearing, found that the petitioner’s grievance had been satisfactorily resolved. Consequently, the petitioner sought to withdraw both writ petitions. The court accepted the withdrawal and disposed of the petitions as withdrawn.

Subjects

writ petition
withdrawal
disposal

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:37601



                                                                   903 WPs2853.2013+
                                                -1-

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                              WRIT PETITION NO. 2853 OF 2013
                              SARALA TUKARAM CHAUDHARI
                                         VERSUS
                         THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                            …
                                          AND
                                            …

                            WRIT PETITION NO. 2837 OF 2013
                             SARALA TUKARAM CHAUDHARI
                                         VERSUS
                       THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                             …
              Advocate for the Petitioner in both Petitions : Mr. Madhav M
              Bhokarikar
              AGP for Respondent/State in both Petitions: Mr. R. B. Dhaware
              Advocate for Respondent No.2 in both Petitions : Mr. Ujwal
              Subhash Patil
                                             …
                                           CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                                              Date : 20.08.2026
              PER COURT :-
              1.           Since, grievance of the Petitioner is satisfied, as such,

              nothing survives in the Petitions and, on instructions, seeks

              withdrawal of the Petitions.


              2.           Accordingly, the Writ Petitions stand disposed of as

              withdrawn.



                                                      (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)
              marathe

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…