Bombay High Court
CHANDRAKANT BHAUSAHEB AJBEversusASSISTANT CHARITY COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petition is deemed infructuous and is therefore disposed of.
Summary
The petitioner, Chandrakand Bhausaheb Ajbe, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Assistant Charity Commissioner. The petitioner was represented by Advocate B. B. Kulkarni. The respondent State was represented by Advocate S. P. Sonpawale, AGP. The learned judge observed that, owing to the passage of time, the petition could no longer be entertained. Consequently, the court held the petition to be infructuous and disposed of it on that basis.
Issues considered
- What is the effect of the passage of time on the maintainability of the writ petition?
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- limitation
- High Court
- jurisdiction
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:46491
1
1-wp-2837-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2837 OF 2023
Chandrakant Bhausaheb Ajbe
VERSUS
Assistant Charity Commissioner And Others
...
Mr. B. B. Kulkarni, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. S. P. Sonpawale, AGP for Respondent-State
…..
CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
DATED : 05TH OCTOBER, 2026
P.C. :-
. Mr. B. B. Kulkarni, learned Advocate for the petitioner
submits that by passage of time, the Writ Petition has become
infructuous.
2. In view of above, Writ Petition stands disposed of as
infructuous.
( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. )
Rushikesh/2026
Checking your session…