Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

CHANDRAKANT BHAUSAHEB AJBEversusASSISTANT CHARITY COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The writ petition is deemed infructuous and is therefore disposed of.

Summary

The petitioner, Chandrakand Bhausaheb Ajbe, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Assistant Charity Commissioner. The petitioner was represented by Advocate B. B. Kulkarni. The respondent State was represented by Advocate S. P. Sonpawale, AGP. The learned judge observed that, owing to the passage of time, the petition could no longer be entertained. Consequently, the court held the petition to be infructuous and disposed of it on that basis.

Issues considered

  • What is the effect of the passage of time on the maintainability of the writ petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • limitation
  • High Court
  • jurisdiction

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:46491



                                                      1
                                                                        1-wp-2837-2023

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                      WRIT PETITION NO. 2837 OF 2023

                                      Chandrakant Bhausaheb Ajbe
                                                 VERSUS
                               Assistant Charity Commissioner And Others
                                                    ...
                     Mr. B. B. Kulkarni, Advocate for the Petitioner
                     Mr. S. P. Sonpawale, AGP for Respondent-State
                                                   …..
                                          CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
                                             DATED : 05TH OCTOBER, 2026

                     P.C. :-

                     .         Mr. B. B. Kulkarni, learned Advocate for the petitioner

                     submits that by passage of time, the Writ Petition has become

                     infructuous.

                     2.        In view of above, Writ Petition stands disposed of as

                     infructuous.



                                                          ( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. )

                     Rushikesh/2026


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.