Bombay High Court
MOHAMMED IQBAL ABDULLAH BAKKARversusZONAL MANAGER UCO BANK
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Mohammed Iqbal Abdullah Bakkar, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner during the hearing. The petitioner indicated that he was not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. The respondent, UCO Bank, was represented by Mr. Hafeezur Rahman. The Court observed the lack of prosecution and the petitioner's disinterest. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution without any order for costs.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution?
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal for want of prosecution
- civil procedure
- non-appearance
- high court
Judgment
Digitally
signed by
SHAMBHAVI
SHAMBHAVI NILESH
NILESH
SHIVGAN
SHIVGAN
Date:
19_WP_2882_2021.DOC
2026.10.05
11:50:55
+0530
Shivgan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2882 OF 2021
Mohammed Iqbal Abdullah Bakkar ...Petitioner
Versus
Zonal Manager UCO Bank ...Respondent
_______
None for Petitioner.
Mr Hafeezur Rahman, for Respondent- UCO Bank.
_______
CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI &
DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.
DATE: 30th SEPTEMBER 2026
P.C.
1. None appears for the Petitioner.
2. It appears that the Petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the Writ
Petition.
3. Dismissed for want of prosecution. No costs.
(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.