Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MOHD. SAWAR MOHAMMAD SHAMIMversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition was dismissed as the petitioner failed to appear for hearing, amounting to non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Mohd. Sarwar Mohammad Shamim, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. The petition was listed for hearing on 1st October 2026. When called, the petitioner failed to appear despite the petition being circulated. The Court noted the non‑appearance and held that the petition could not be proceeded with. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be proceeded with when the petitioner fails to appear for the scheduled hearing?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑appearance
  • dismissal
  • procedural
  • high court

Judgment

TRUPTI
SADANAND
BAMNE

Digitally signed by
TRUPTI
                               TSB                                                22-wp-2884-2026.doc
SADANAND
BAMNE
Date: 2026.10.05
12:41:43 +0530
                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                              CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                               WRIT PETITION NO. 2884 OF 2026

                      Mohd. Sarwar Mohammad Shamim                                   … Petitioner

                                V/s.

                      State of Maharashtra                                           … Respondent



                      None for the Petitioner.
                      Mr. Ashish I. Satpute, APP, for the Respondent -State.




                                                           CORAM :   A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                     KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                              DATE : 1st October, 2026

                      P.C.:-

                      1)                Despite circulating the Petition, none appears for the Petitioner,

                      when called out for hearing.

                      2)                Dismissed for non prosecution.



                                     (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                   (A.S. GADKARI, J.)




                                                                                                        1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.