Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAJABAI SHIVAJI BHOSALE AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposal
Dismissed

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioners Rajabai Shivaji Bhosale and another filed a writ petition challenging a criminal revision application pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Barshi, alleging delay and flimsy grounds. During the hearing, the brother of Petitioners' second petitioner, present in court, requested withdrawal of the petition, which the court accepted. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. The court, however, directed the Additional Sessions Judge to expedite the pending criminal revision application within four months. The registry was instructed to inform the lower court of this order, and the petition was formally disposed of.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal revision
  • court interference
  • expedited disposal

Judgment

                                                                                        5-WP-2893-2025 (CR).odt




                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                        CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                     CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                         WRIT PETITION NO. 2893 OF 2025

                      Rajabai Shivaji Bhosale & Anr                        ..… Petitioners
                             VERSUS
                      State of Maharashtra                                 ..… Respondent
                                                            ...
                      Mr. I. M. Khairdi, Advocate for Petitioners.

                      Mr. Anand S. Shalgaonkar, APP for Respondent No. 1-State.
                                                         ...

                                                       CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.
                                                       DATE  : AUGUST 28, 2026
                      PER COURT :

                      1.           After hearing the learned Advocate for the Petitioner for some

                      time, when this Court expressed its disinclination to interfere with the

                      impugned order, on instructions of the brother of Petitioner No. 2, who is

                      present in the Court, seeks leave to withdraw the Petition. His statement is

                      accepted.

                      2.           In view of the statement, the Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

                      3.           Needless to clarify that the proceedings bearing R.C.C. No. 47

                      of 2013 have been pending before the learned Trial Court for more than 10

                      years, i.e. since the year 2013. Similarly, from the order passed by the learned

         Digitally
                      Additional Sessions Judge, Barshi, it appears that the learned Addi. Sessions
         signed by
         TALLE
TALLE    SHUBHAM
SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO
ASHOKRAO Date:
         2026.08.29
         10:46:09
                      Judge was ready to hear and finally decide the Criminal Revision Application
         +0530




                      Shubham                                                                       Page 1 of 2
                                                               5-WP-2893-2025 (CR).odt



pending before him. However, instead of arguing the matter before the

learned Sessions Judge, the Petitioner approached this Court on flimsy

grounds mentioned in the Petition.

4.          In view of the same, the learned Additional Sessions Judge,

Barshi, is directed to hear and dispose of Criminal Revision Application No.

5 of 2015 pending before him as expeditiously as possible and preferably

within a period of four months from the receipt of a copy of this order. The

Petitioners undertake to cooperate with the learned Sessions Court.

5.          The Registry is directed to inform the concerned Court of the

order accordingly.

6.          The Petition is disposed of.




                                                  (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.)




Shubham                                                                    Page 2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.