Bombay High Court

JAVED YUNUS ANSARIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

Decided: 19 August 2026
Disposal: WITHDRAWN

Holding

The petition was allowed to be withdrawn and the case was disposed of.

Summary

Javed Yunus Ansari filed a writ petition (No. 2905 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioner was directed to comply with an order dated 11 August 2025 issued by the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA). After compliance, the petitioner's counsel sought to withdraw the petition, stating that there was no further relief to be sought. The Court considered whether the petition could be withdrawn after the statutory order had been complied with. The Court allowed the withdrawal, noting that the petitioner had no remaining cause of action. Consequently, the petition was dismissed and the matter was disposed of.

Issues considered

Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn after the petitioner has complied with the order of the authority.

Subjects

withdrawal of petition
compliance with order
civil procedure
writ petition
disposal

Judgment

                                                                                    4-wp 2905-26.doc
ARJUN
MACHHINDRA
KADAM                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Digitally signed by
ARJUN MACHHINDRA
KADAM                                       WRIT PETITION NO. 2905 OF 2026
Date: 2026.08.19
18:12:40 +0530

                      Javed Yunus Ansari                                         … Petitioner
                               Versus
                      State of Maharashtra & Ors.                                 ... Respondents

                                              __________________________

                      Mr. Pratik K. Shah a/w. Mr. Yash A. Dhakad for the Petitioner.
                      Smt. Vrushali Kabre, AGP for the Respondent-State.
                      Mr.Joel Carlos a/w. Ms. Jyoti Mhatre and Mr. Bibhishan Sutar for
                      Respondent-BMC.
                      Mr. P. G. Lad a/w. Ms. Pooja Joshi Deshmukh for the Respondent-MHADA.
                      Mr. Aamir Koradia a/w. Adv. Misba Loladia for Respondent No.11.

                                              __________________________

                                                      CORAM        : M. S. KARNIK AND
                                                                     SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.
                                                      DATED        : 19th AUGUST, 2026.

                      P.C. :

                      1.       Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the Order dated

                      11th August, 2025 passed by MHADA has been complied with, learned

                      counsel for the petitioner is instructed to withdraw the petition.

                      2.       Allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.



                      (SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)                                    (M. S. KARNIK, J.)




                       Amk                                                                  1/1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.