Bombay High Court

TILAK LAUTAN YADAVversusRELIANCE ENTERPRISES AND 3 OTHERS

Decided: 19 August 2026
Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court permitted the withdrawal of the writ petition and disposed of it without examining the merits.

Summary

Tilak Lautam Yadav filed Writ Petition No. 2947 of 2019 against Reliance Enterprises and others. The petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition, indicating a possible representation to the Authority if required. The Court, after hearing, allowed the withdrawal and expressly kept open the liberty to file a fresh petition. It clarified that no merits of the petition were examined and all contentions remain open. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of.

Issues considered

Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition and retain the liberty to file a fresh petition

Subjects

withdrawal of petition
writ petition
procedural order
high court

Judgment

                                                      33C. WP 2947-2019.doc

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                  ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                       WRIT PETITION NO.2947 OF 2019

Tilak Lautam Yadav                          ….   Petitioner
         Versus
Reliance Enterprises And 3 Ors.             …    Respondents
                                  …..
Mr. Jayesh Bhatt a/w Adv. Nazreen Manchekar for the Petitioners.
Adv. Shivani Samel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Mr. Anoop Patil a/w Mr. Darpan Gupta and Ms. Kasturi Marathe for
Respondent Nos.6 and 7-SRA.
Shri S.B. Gore, A.G.P. for Respondent-State.
                                  …..
                              CORAM: M.S. KARNIK &
                                       SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.

                                 DATED : 19th AUGUST 2026
P.C.

1.            The learned Counsel for the Petitioners fairly submits on

instructions that he may be permitted to withdraw the Petition, with

liberty to the Petitioners to make representation to the Authority, if

necessary.


2.         It is made clear that we have not examined the contentions

raised in the Writ Petition on merits and all the contentions of the

parties are kept open.



RaJesh Chittewan, PS                                                     1/2
                                                           33C. WP 2947-2019.doc

3.        Liberty to file a fresh Petition is also kept open.


4.        The Writ Petition stands disposed of.




(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)                              (M.S. KARNIK, J.)




RaJesh Chittewan, PS                                                          2/2
              Digitally signed
RAJESH        by RAJESH
              VASANT
VASANT        CHITTEWAN
CHITTEWAN     Date: 2026.08.21
              15:49:27 +0530

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

Shivani Samel