Bombay High Court
KRUSHNA SHIVAJI DABHADE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Tahsildar must decide the petitioners' representation on its merits within six weeks of the Court's order.
Summary
The petitioners, Krushna Shivaji Dabhide and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. They alleged that the Tahsildar (respondent No.4) had not yet decided on their representation dated 14‑02‑2025. The Court examined whether the Tahsildar was obligated to adjudicate the representation on its merits without undue delay. The Bench concluded that the Tahsildar must render a decision on the pending representation. Accordingly, the Court directed the Tahsildar to decide the matter within six weeks of receiving the order, and the writ petition was disposed.
Issues considered
- What is the duty of the Tahsildar to decide the petitioners' representation filed on 14‑02‑2025?
Subjects
- writ petition
- administrative law
- representation
- Tahsildar
- court order
- delay
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:42722-DB
1 4-WP-2970-26.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2970 OF 2026
KRUSHNA SHIVAJI DABHADE AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND
OTHERS
...
Mr. Ajay T. Kanawade a/w Mr. Mayur H. Bedre, Advocates h/f Mr.
Mahesh Rautray, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. M. K. Goyanka, AGP for Respondents/State
...
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 15th SEPTEMBER, 2026
PER COURT :
. The writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent
No.4 Tahsildar to decide the representation of the petitioners dated
14/02/2025, if not already decided, on it’s own merit, within a
period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
SVH
Checking your session…