Bombay High Court
CHANDRAKANT GHELANI AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary
Petitioners Chandrakant Ghelani and another filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging a matter against the State of Maharashtra and another. The petition was presented by Ms. Pragya, assisted by Ms. Dhruvika Bhayani. The State of Maharashtra was represented by Ms. Anuja S. Gotad, and the second respondent by Mr. Kaushal Popat with Mr. Chetan Pawar. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that the petition had become infructuous. The court, after noting this submission, held that there was no longer any live relief to be granted and consequently disposed of the petition as infructuous.
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- disposal
- Bombay High Court
- civil procedure
Judgment
23.WP.300.2022.doc
HARSHADA H. SAWANT
(P.A.)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.300 OF 2022
Chandrakant Ghelani And Anr. .. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents
....................
Ms. Pragya, Advocate i/by Ms. Dhruvika Bhayani for Petitioners.
Ms. Anuja S. Gotad, APP for Respondent No.1 – State.
Mr. Kaushal Popat a/w. Mr. Chetan Pawar, Advocates i/by White &
Brief for Respondent No.2.
...................
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 01, 2026
P.C.:
1. Heard Ms. Pragya, learned Advocate for Petitioners; Ms.
Gotad, learned APP for Respondent No.1 – State and Mr. Popat,
learned Advocate for Respondent No.2.
2. Ms. Pragya informs the Court that Petition is rendered
infructuous.
3. Therefore Petition is disposed of as infructuous.
H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
Digitally signed
by HARSHADA
HARSHADA HANUMANT
HANUMANT SAWANT
SAWANT Date:
2026.09.01
15:14:41 +0530
1 of 1
Checking your session…