Bombay High Court

RAMRAJ MELHURAM JAISAWALversusRELIANCE ENTERPRISES AND 3 ORS.

Decided: 19 August 2026
Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The writ petition was disposed of after permitting its withdrawal, without examining the merits.

Summary

The petitioner, Ramraj Melhuram Jaisawal, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to make representations to the relevant authority if needed. The Court granted the request, allowing the petition to be withdrawn and keeping open the possibility for the petitioner to file a fresh petition. The Court expressly stated that it had not examined the merits of any contentions raised in the writ petition. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of without any substantive adjudication.

Issues considered

Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition
Whether liberty should be granted to the petitioner to make representations to the authority
Whether the petitioner may be allowed to file a fresh petition in the future

Subjects

withdrawal of writ petition
liberty to file fresh petition
disposal without merits
high court procedure

Judgment

                                                     33B. WP 3010-2019.doc

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                  ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                       WRIT PETITION NO.3010 OF 2019

Ramraj Melhuram Jaisawal                   ….   Petitioner
         Versus
Reliance Enterprises And 3 Ors.            …    Respondents
                               …..
Mr. Jayesh Bhatt a/w Adv. Nazreen Manchekar for the Petitioners.
Adv. Shivani Samel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Mr. Anoop Patil a/w Mr. Darpan Gupta and Ms. Kasturi Marathe for
Respondent Nos.6 and 7-SRA.
Smt. Madhura Deshmukh, A.G.P. for Respondent-State.
                               …..
                            CORAM: M.S. KARNIK &
                                    SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.

                                DATED : 19th AUGUST 2026
P.C.

1.            The learned Counsel for the Petitioner fairly submits on

instructions that he may be permitted to withdraw the Petition, with

liberty to the Petitioners to make representation to the Authority, if

necessary.


2.         It is made clear that we have not examined the contentions

raised in the Writ Petition on merits and all the contentions of the

parties are kept open.



RaJesh Chittewan, PS                                                    1/2
                                                           33B. WP 3010-2019.doc

3.        Liberty to file a fresh Petition is also kept open.


4.        The Writ Petition stands disposed of.




(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)                              (M.S. KARNIK, J.)




RaJesh Chittewan, PS                                                          2/2
                Digitally signed by
RAJESH    RAJESH VASANT
VASANT    CHITTEWAN
CHITTEWAN Date: 2026.08.21
          15:46:11 +0530

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

Shivani Samel