Bombay High Court

SUJIT RAMRAJ JAISAWALversusRELIANCE ENTERPRISES AND 3 ORS.

Decided: 19 August 2026
Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court permitted the withdrawal of the writ petition and disposed of it without examining the merits.

Summary

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking relief against Reliance Enterprises and others. The petitioner's counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition, offering the petitioner liberty to make representations to the authority if needed. The Court allowed the withdrawal, clarified that it had not examined any merits, and kept open the possibility for the petitioner to file a fresh petition. No substantive issues were decided. Consequently, the writ petition was formally disposed of.

Issues considered

Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition
Whether the petitioner retains liberty to file a fresh petition

Subjects

withdrawal of writ petition
procedural order
fresh petition
high court
disposal without merits

Judgment

                                                     33A. WP 3016-2019.doc

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                  ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                       WRIT PETITION NO.3016 OF 2019

Sujit Ramraj Jaisawal                      ….   Petitioner
         Versus
Reliance Enterprises And 3 Ors.            …    Respondents
                                 …..
Mr. Jayesh Bhatt a/w Adv. Nazreen Manchekar for the Petitioners.
Adv. Shivani Samel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Mr. Anoop Patil a/w Mr. Darpan Gupta and Ms. Kasturi Marathe for
Respondent Nos.6 and 7-SRA.
Smt. Fatima Lakdawala, A.G.P. for Respondent-State.
                                 …..
                            CORAM: M.S. KARNIK &
                                      SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.

                                DATED : 19th AUGUST 2026
P.C.

1.            The learned Counsel for the Petitioner fairly submits on

instructions that he may be permitted to withdraw the Petition, with

liberty to the Petitioners to make representation to the Authority, if

necessary.


2.         It is made clear that we have not examined the contentions

raised in the Writ Petition on merits and all the contentions of the

parties are kept open.



RaJesh Chittewan, PS                                                    1/2
                                                           33A. WP 3016-2019.doc

3.        Liberty to file a fresh Petition is also kept open.


4.        The Writ Petition stands disposed of.




(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)                              (M.S. KARNIK, J.)




RaJesh Chittewan, PS                                                          2/2
              Digitally signed
RAJESH    by RAJESH
          VASANT
VASANT    CHITTEWAN
CHITTEWAN Date: 2026.08.21
              15:42:10 +0530

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

Shivani Samel