Bombay High Court
PRASHANT PANDHARINATH KHANDAGALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
All the writ petitions stand disposed off and the interim relief is vacated, subject to a six‑week extension.
Summary
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, dealt with several writ petitions filed by doctors against the State of Maharashtra. One petition (WP No.2933 of 2019) was withdrawn on the petitioner's request and consequently dismissed. The remaining petitions (WP Nos.11919 of 2021, 3056 of 2019, 3057 of 2019) were taken on board and the court held that they were covered by its earlier judgment in Writ Petition No.6549 of 2026. Accordingly, all these petitions were disposed of and any interim relief previously granted was vacated, although a short extension of six weeks of interim relief was permitted. The order reflects procedural disposal rather than substantive adjudication on the merits.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petitions should be withdrawn or dismissed.
- Whether the interim relief granted in the earlier petitions should continue or be vacated.
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- interim relief
- vacated
- disposal
- High Court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:35396-DB
904-WP.11919.2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
904 WRIT PETITION NO. 11919 OF 2021
Dr. Dadasaheb Hanumatrao Dhage ….Petitioner
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & Others …..Respondents
AND
WRIT PETITION NO. 2933 OF 2019
Dr. Sunanda Shriram Kathar ….Petitioner
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & Others …..Respondents
AND
WRIT PETITION NO.3056 OF 2019
Dr. Prashant Pandharinath Khandagale ….Petitioner
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …..Respondents
AND
WRIT PETITION NO.3057 OF 2019
Dr. Omprakash s/o Baswant Kadam ….Petitioner
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …..Respondents
…..
Mr. M. P. Kale, Advocate for the Petitioner in all WP.
Mr. R. S. Wani, AGP for Respondents-State.
…..
CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT &
JITENDRA JAIN, JJ.
DATE : 11th AUGUST, 2026
PER COURT :
ORDER IN WP No.2933 of 2019 :-
1. Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board.
2. Learned Advocate for the petitioner, on instructions from the
petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition.
Sayyed 1/2
904-WP.11919.2021
3. Leave granted.
4. Writ petition stands disposed off as withdrawn.
ORDER IN WP Nos.11919 of 2021 and 3057 of 2019 and 3056 of
2019 :-
5. Writ Petition Nos. 3057 of 2019 and 3056 of 2019 are not on
board. Upon mentioning, taken on board.
6. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the present
petitions are squarely covered by the judgment delivered by this
Court in Writ Petition No.6549 of 2026 and other connected writ
petitions.
7. In view of judgment in Writ Petition No.6549 of 2026
alongwith connected matters. All the petitions stand disposed off.
8. Needless say that interim relief stands vacated.
9. At this stage, learned Advocate prays that the interim relief is
running since last so many years and the same be continued for
further period of six weeks. Considering that, even in the above
group of petitions, this Court had granted stay for six months from
the operation of the order passed by this Court, there shall be interim
relief already granted for a further period of six weeks.
(JITENDRA JAIN, J.) (KISHORE C. SANT, J.)
Sayyed 2/2
Checking your session…