Bombay High Court

SHYAM MANOHAR PANDEYversusRELIANCE ENTERPRISES AND 6 ORS

Decided: 19 August 2026
Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The writ petition is disposed of, with permission granted to withdraw and the liberty to file a fresh petition retained.

Summary

The petitioners sought to withdraw their writ petition and requested liberty to make a fresh representation to the authority if needed. The Court, without examining the merits of the petition, granted permission for withdrawal and kept the option open for filing a fresh petition. No substantive issues were addressed. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of. All parties' contentions remain open for future proceedings.

Subjects

withdrawal of petition
writ petition
procedural order
high court

Judgment

                                                       33J. WP 3067-2019.doc

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                  ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                       WRIT PETITION NO.3067 OF 2019

Shyam Manohar Pandey                        ….   Petitioner
         Versus
Reliance Enterprises And 3 Ors.             …    Respondents
                                 …..
Mr. Jayesh Bhatt a/w Adv. Nazreen Manchekar for the Petitioners.
Adv. Shivani Samel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Mr. Anoop Patil a/w Mr. Darpan Gupta and Ms. Kasturi Marathe for
Respondent Nos.6 and 7-SRA.
Mr. Prashant Kamble, A.G.P. for Respondent-State.
                                 …..
                             CORAM: M.S. KARNIK &
                                      SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.

                                 DATED : 19th AUGUST 2026
P.C.

1.            The learned Counsel for the Petitioners fairly submits on

instructions that he may be permitted to withdraw the Petition, with

liberty to the Petitioners to make representation to the Authority, if

necessary.


2.         It is made clear that we have not examined the contentions

raised in the Writ Petition on merits and all the contentions of the

parties are kept open.



RaJesh Chittewan, PS                                                      1/2
                                                            33J. WP 3067-2019.doc

3.        Liberty to file a fresh Petition is also kept open.


4.        The Writ Petition stands disposed of.




(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)                              (M.S. KARNIK, J.)




RaJesh Chittewan, PS                                                           2/2
                 Digitally signed
RAJESH           by RAJESH
                 VASANT
VASANT           CHITTEWAN
CHITTEWAN        Date: 2026.08.21
                 16:21:39 +0530

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

Shivani Samel