Bombay High Court

WALLACE PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD.versusKRUPAL HADAWALE AND ANR

Decided: 16 September 2026
Disposal: Disposed Off

Holding

The court may correct clerical and typographical errors in its orders to reflect the true intention of the judgment.

Summary

Wallace Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. filed a writ petition seeking correction of typographical errors in the court's order dated 16 September 2026. The petitioners requested specific amendments to the language, names, and dates in various paragraphs of the order. The respondents, Krupal Hadawale & Anr., were represented by counsel Vinod Shetty and Rahil Fazelbhoy. The court examined its inherent power to amend clerical mistakes to ensure the order reflects the true intention of the judgment. It allowed the corrections as proposed, directing that the order be read with the amended wording. The corrected order was subsequently signed by the court clerk.

Issues considered

Whether the High Court can correct typographical and clerical errors in its own order under its inherent jurisdiction?

Subjects

court order correction
typographical error
inherent jurisdiction
civil procedure
writ petition

Judgment

      This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //
k                                         1/2                      1p wp 3077.26 as.doc




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                         WRIT PETITION NO.3077 OF 2026

Wallace Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.                                     ....Petitioner
      V/S
Krupal Hadawale & Anr.                                                ....Respondents
                               _________

None for the Petitioner.
Mr. Vinod Shetty a/w Mr. Rahil Fazelbhoy for Respondents.
                              __________


                                  CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
                                  DATE : 21 SEPTEMBER 2026.

P.C.:


1.       Motion is made for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 16
September 2026.


2.       Following corrections be carried out in the order:


i)       In paragraph 4, line No.3, the word ‘Petitioner’ be replaced by the
words ‘Respondent No.1’.


ii)      In paragraph 5, line No.13, the words ‘a queried’ be replaced by the
words ‘a query’, in line No.25, the word ‘Raigad’ be replaced by the word
‘Raipur’ and the word ‘Petitioner’ be replaced by the words ‘Respondent
No.1’.



katkam                                           Page No. 1 of 2
                                This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //
                         k                                          2/2                           1p wp 3077.26 as.doc




                         iii)      In paragraph 7, line No.6, the year ‘2026’ be replaced by the year
                         ‘2025’ and


                         iv)       In paragraph 9, in line No.14, the words ‘Respondent No.1’ be
                         replaced by the word ‘the Petitioner’.


                         3.        The order be corrected and read accordingly.



                                                                                             (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)




                          katkam
Signed by: Sudarshan R. Katkam                                             Page No. 2 of 2
Designation: PS To Honourable Judge
Date: 22/09/2026 11:02:44

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.