Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRATIK HASMUKH SHAHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court held that a petition may be dismissed as withdrawn when the petitioner elects to withdraw it and the Court permits the withdrawal.

Summary

Pratik Hasmukh Shah filed Writ Petition No. 3082 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court challenging a matter against the State of Maharashtra. Both parties appeared before the Court, with Mr. Chaitanya M. Bagul representing the petitioner and Mr. Sukanta A. Karmakar appearing for the State. During the hearing, the petitioner expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The learned counsel successfully persuaded the Court to permit the withdrawal. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • high court
  • procedure

Judgment

                                                                                               27-WP-3082-26.doc

               rsk

                                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                       CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                                  WRIT PETITION NO.3082 OF 2026

                              Pratik Hasmukh Shah                                        .. Petitioner
                                         Versus
                              State Of Maharashtra And
                              Anr.                                                       .. Respondent

                                                        ....................
                               Mr. Chaitanya M. Bagul for the Petitioner.
                               Mr. Sukanta A. Karmakar, APP for the Respondent-State.
                                                               ...................

                                                              CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                                              DATE          : SEPTEMBER 18, 2026
                              P.C.:

                              1.      Heard Mr. Chaitanya M. Bagul, learned counsel for the Petitioner

                              and Mr. Sukanta A. Karmakar, learned APP for the Respondent-State.


                              2.      Learned Advocate persuaded the Court to allow the petitioner to

                              withdraw the petition.
           Digitally signed
           by RAJESHWARI
RAJESHWARI SUBODH
SUBODH     KARVE
KARVE      Date:
           2026.09.21
           11:22:44 +0530     3.      Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.


rsk                                                                            [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]




                                                                                                          1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.