Bombay High Court

H V REALTORSversusSLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY

Decided: 6 October 2026
Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is withdrawn with liberty to file afresh after the pending writ petitions are decided.

Summary

H.V. Realtors filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking leave to withdraw the petition and obtain liberty to file a fresh petition after the resolution of two related writ petitions pending before a Single Judge. The petitioner’s counsel requested the court’s permission to withdraw and re‑file. The Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn, granting the liberty sought, and expressly noted that it did not consider any merits of the parties’ contentions. The order also directed that the petitioner may file a fresh petition after the pending matters are decided. No substantive issues on the merits were addressed.

Issues considered

Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition after related pending petitions are decided

Subjects

withdrawal of writ petition
liberty to refile
procedural law
High Court of Bombay

Judgment

                                                               1-WP-3090-2026.doc


              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                  ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                             WRIT PETITION NO. 3090 OF 2026

H.V.Realtors                                               .....Petitioner
               Versus
Slum Rehabilitation Authority                              .....Respondents
                                  .....
Mr. Arun Panickar for the Petitioner.

Ms. Ravleen Sabharwal a/w Ms. Yashi Bhatt, Mr. Rishabh Shah i/b
R.S.Justicia Law Chambers, for the Respondent – SRA.
                                ..…
                           CORAM : M. S. KARNIK &
                                      SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.
                                      DATE    : 6th OCTOBER, 2026


P.C.:-

1.       Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the

petition with liberty to file afresh after the WPL/3280/2026 and

WPL/3304/2026 pending before the learned Single Judge (details of

which are at page No.120 of the paper-book) are decided.


2.       The petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed

for.


3.       It is made clear that we have not addressed the contention of

either parties on merits.


Wakodikar                                                                    1/2
          Digitally signed
          by RUPALI
          RAJESH
RUPALI    WAKODIKAR
RAJESH
WAKODIKAR Date:
          2026.10.09
          11:48:05
          +0530
                                                    1-WP-3090-2026.doc


4.     Liberty to file afresh after the decision in the aforesaid

petitions.




(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)                       (M. S. KARNIK, J.)




Wakodikar                                                        2/2

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

Arun Panickar