Bombay High Court

RAJARAM JAINANDAN YADAVversusTHE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER

Decided: 6 February 2026
Disposal: WITHDRAWN
Bench: RAVINDRA V GHUGE ABHAY MANTRI

Holding

The petition is disposed of as withdrawn on the petitioner’s request.

Summary

The petitioner, Rajaram Jainandan Yadav, filed Writ Petition No. 3096 of 2024 in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Municipal Commissioner and others. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel submitted a photocopy of a written communication dated 5 February 2026, in which the petitioner expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The court noted the submission and, after granting an overnight passover, considered the request. No substantive arguments on the merits were made, as the petitioner chose to discontinue the proceedings. Consequently, the court ordered the petition to be disposed of as withdrawn, and the matter was closed without any further orders.

Subjects

withdrawal of petition
writ petition
civil procedure
high court
disposal of case

Judgment

                                                    910-WP-3096-2024 (SO).odt




        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
            ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                  WRIT PETITION NO.3096 OF 2024
Rajaram Jainandan Yadav                          ….Petitioner
      Versus
The Municipal Commissioner & Ors.                ….Respondents
                                 ----
Ms. Panthi Desai i/b. M/s. M. P. Vashi And Associates, Advocate for
the Petitioner.
Mr. Pratik Garde, Advocate for the Respondent No.1-BMC
                                ----
                          CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE &
                                      ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
                          DATE : 6th FEBRUARY, 2026

P.C. :-

1.             This matter was heard at length. An overnight passover

was granted.

2.             The learned Advocate for the Petitioner tenders a

photostat copy of the written Communication dated 5th February,

2026, received by her from the Petitioner, requesting her to

withdraw the Petition. The said photostat copy is marked as ‘X’ for

identification.

3.          In view of the above, this Petition is disposed off as

withdrawn on instructions.



(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.)                  (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)



Kartikeya                         1 of 1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.