Bombay High Court

RAMESH DIGAMBER DESHPANDE AND OTHERSversusHANUMANT DATTATRAY DESHMUKH

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

A writ petition (No. 3102 of 2015) was filed by Ramesh Digamber Deshpande and others. The petitioners failed to appear before the High Court on the dates scheduled, first on 25 August 2026 and again on 2 September 2026. The Court noted the absence and inferred that the petitioners were not interested in pursuing the relief sought. Consequently, the Court held that there was a want of prosecution. The petition was therefore dismissed.

Issues considered

Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioners' non-appearance

Subjects

writ petition
dismissal
want of prosecution
non-appearance

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:39958



                                                                       43 WP No.3102.2015
                                                   -1-

                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 3102 OF 2015

                             RAMESH DIGAMBER DESHPANDE AND OTHERS
                                            VERSUS
                                 HANUMANT DATTATRAY DESHMUKH
                                                  ***
              Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Suhas B. Ghute

                                                  ***

                                   CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                                      Date : 2nd September, 2026

              PER COURT :-


              1.              On 25.08.2026, this Court passed an order recording

              the absence of the petitioners and directed that the matter be

              listed today for dismissal.


              2.              Today, when the matter was called out, none appeared

              on behalf of the petitioners. It is evident that the petitioners are

              not interested in prosecuting this matter further.


              3.              In view of the above, the petition is dismissed for want

              of prosecution.



                                                         (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)



              Omkar Joshi

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…