Bombay High Court

VITTHAL RUKMINI SOUND SYSTEM SANGHATANA PANDHARPUR THR. PRESIDENT SHRIMANT P. YADAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposal: Disposed Off

Holding

The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Vitthal Rukmini Sound System Sanghatana, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench. The learned Additional Government Pleader informed the Court that the petition had become infructuous because a representation made by the petitioner was decided by respondent No. 4 on 30 April 2026. Acting on his client’s instructions, the petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Pravin Jadhav, sought liberty to withdraw the writ petition. The Court entertained the request and ordered that the writ petition stand disposed of as withdrawn. Consequently, no further adjudication on the merits was undertaken.

Subjects

writ petition
withdrawal
criminal appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                                                            10-WP-316-2026 (CR).docx


           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                   CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

               CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 316 OF 2026

Vitthal Rukmini Sound System Sanghatana
Pandharpur Thr. President Shrimant P.
Yadav                                                  … Petitioner
            V/s.
The State Of Maharashtra And Ors                       … Respondents
                    ________________________
Mr. Pravin Jadhav, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. Pankaj P. Deokar, APP for the respondents-State.
                   _________________________

                                   CORAM          : RAJESH S. PATIL &
                                                    ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.

                                   DATED          : SEPTEMBER 9, 2026
P.C.:


1.      The learned AGP submits that the petition has become

infructuous as the representation made by the petitioner has been

decided by respondent No. 4 on 30 April 2026.


2.      Mr.Pravin Jadhav, learned counsel for the petitioner, on

instructions of his client, seeks liberty to withdraw the writ petition.


3.      Writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.




(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.)                                  (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)




                                         1/1
adn

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…