Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SOW.RAMADEVI W/O.CHANDRAKUMAR JAISWAL AND OTHERSversusTHE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER HIGH COWER CONSTRUCTION DIVN.NANDED AND ORS.

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.

Summary

The petitioners, Smt. Ramadevi w/o Chandrakumar Jaiswal and others, filed a writ petition (No. 3166 of 2009) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against the Executive Engineer, High Cower Construction Division, Nanded and others. The petition sought relief, but during the hearing the petitioner's counsel, Mr. A. S. Gandhi, informed the court that the petition had become infructuous. The court accepted this statement and examined whether any further adjudication was necessary. Since the cause of action no longer existed, the court found no ground to continue the proceedings. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as infructuous, without any order on the merits. No substantive legal issues were addressed beyond the procedural disposition.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition remains maintainable when the cause of action has become infructuous

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • disposal
  • procedural termination
  • High Court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:23002


                                                                     937-WP-3166-2009.odt




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                              937 WRIT PETITION NO. 3166 OF 2009

                 SOW.RAMADEVI W/O.CHANDRAKUMAR JAISWAL AND OTHERS
                                              VERSUS
                   THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER HIGH COWER CONSTRUCTION
                                     DIVN.NANDED AND ORS.
                                                 .…
                 Mr. A. S. Gandhi, Advocate for Petitioners
                                                 .…

                                    CORAM : ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.

                                       DATE : June 12, 2026
                 PER COURT :-


                 1.          Mr. Gandhi, learned counsel makes a statement that

                 the petition has become infructuous.


                 2.          In view of above statement, writ petition is disposed of

                 as infructuous.



                                                     [ ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J. ]

                 SMS




                                                                                   1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.