Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

YOGESH SHRIRAM KORDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Yogesh Shriram Korde, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner failed to appear on several scheduled dates, including 2 September 2026, 9 June 2026, and 3 February 2023, despite the matter being called out. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in prosecuting the petition. No arguments or submissions were made on behalf of the petitioner. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear before the court

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • non-appearance
  • high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:43186


                          IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                              12 WRIT PETITION NO. 3204 OF 2022

                                        Yogesh Shriram Korde
                                               VERSUS
                               The State Of Maharashtra And Another
                                                  ...
                              Advocate for the Petitioner : None Present
                            AGP for Respondents-State: Ms. M. L. Sangeet
                                                  ...

                                   CORAM       : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.
                                   Dated       : September 23, 2026

           PER COURT :-

           1.       None for the petitioner.

           2.       On the previous date, i.e. 2nd September 2026, also none

           appeared for the petitioner, although the matter was called out.

           3.       Similarly, on 9th June 2026 and 3rd February 2023, there was no

           appearance on behalf of the petitioner.

           4.       It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the

           petition.

           5.       The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.




                                                              ( ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. )




           vj gawade/-.




                                                Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.