Bombay High Court
DEEPAK SARAFversusRAKESH MAKHIJA AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The Court allowed the withdrawal of the petition and granted liberty to file a suitably worded petition.
Summary
The petitioner, Deepak Saraf, filed a writ petition which the counsel admitted was inadequately worded and deficient in pleading. The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition and obtain liberty to file a properly drafted petition on the same cause of action. The Court examined the request and granted leave to withdraw the petition, also permitting the petitioner to refile a suitably worded petition. Consequently, the original petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the underlying dispute were addressed.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition that is deficient in pleading may be withdrawn with liberty to refile a corrected petition
Subjects
- petition withdrawal
- procedural deficiency
- writ petition
- court discretion
Judgment
apn 47-wp-3223-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3223 OF 2026
Deepak Saraf … Petitioner
V/s.
Rakesh Makhija & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Pramod Panchal a/w. Ms.Neha Rane for the Petitioner.
Mr. Ajay S. Patil, APP, for the Respondent-State.
Mr.Santosh Jadhav, PI, Juhu Police Station, present.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
ASHWINI
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
PRASAD DATE : 24th September, 2026
NARHIRE
Digitally signed by
ASHWINI PRASAD
NARHIRE P.C.:-
Date: 2026.10.03
14:39:23 +0530
1) Mr. Panchal, learned Advocate appearing for Petitioner submits
that, the present Petition, as drafted and presented before this Court, is not
appropriately worded and contains certain deficiencies in the pleading.
2) He, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw the present Petition,
with liberty to file a suitably worded Petition for the same cause of action.
2.1) Leave and liberty granted.
3) Disposed off as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
(KAMAL KHATA, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.