Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SANDAWELLBEING PVT LTD THROUGH AJIT RAMANLAL PATELversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The High Court may order the trial magistrate to decide the pending discharge application and expedite the trial within a specified period.

Summary

Sandawellbeing Pvt Ltd, the first informant, filed a criminal writ petition seeking the High Court to direct the Metropolitan Magistrate's 32nd Court at Bandra to conclude proceedings in case number 1759/PW/2018 and decide a discharge application filed by the accused in 2019. The petitioner argued that the discharge application had been pending for seven years, violating the right to a speedy trial. The State of Maharashtra opposed the relief, seeking no order. The Court, noting the undue delay, exercised its supervisory jurisdiction and ordered that the magistrate decide the pending application within one month and expedite the trial, preferably within a year. Consequently, the writ petition was allowed and the matter was disposed accordingly.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court can direct a Metropolitan Magistrate to decide a pending discharge application within a fixed time frame
  • Whether a writ petition is maintainable to compel expeditious disposal of criminal proceedings

Subjects

  • criminal procedure
  • writ petition
  • discharge application
  • speedy trial
  • magistrate
  • expeditious disposal
  • supervisory jurisdiction

Judgment

                                                        75-WP-3228-2026 (CR).doc

Tikam


               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                     CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                     CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 3228 OF 2026

    Sandawellbeing Pvt Ltd Through Ajit Ramanlal Patel      ...Petitioner/s
    VERSUS
    The State Of Maharashtra                                ...Respondent/s

    _________________________________________________________________

    Mr. Parth Sanghrajka a/w Swati Singh a/w. Ms. Anisha Thakkar i/by
    Rajeev Sawant & Associates, Advocate for Petitioner.
    Smt. R.D. Humane, APP for Respondent-State.
    _________________________________________________________________

                                         CORAM     :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                         DATE      : 9th SEPTEMBER, 2026.
    P.C. :

    1.         Herd learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned APP for the

    State.

    2.         By this Petition, the Petitioner is seeking to direct the Learned

    Metropolitan Magistrate's 32nd Court at Bandra, Mumbai to conclude the

    proceedings in CC No. 1759/PW/2018 in a time bound manner and to

    direct the Learned Trial Court to decide the discharge application at

    Exhibit -2 filed by the accused which is pending since the year 2019 within

    a fixed time frame.

    3.         It is contention of learned counsel for the Petitioner that

    Petitioner is the first informant.     The accused has filed discharge

    application before the Learned Metropolitan Magistrate's 32nd Court at



                                    Page 1 of 2
                                                            75-WP-3228-2026 (CR).doc

Tikam


    Bandra , which is pending since 2019. Hence, direction be given to decide

    the application within time bound manner and requested to allow the writ

    petition.

    4.          Learned APP submits that appropriate order be passed.

    5.          I have heard both learned counsel. It is surprising that discharge

    application filed before the Learned Metropolitan Magistrate's 32nd Court

    at Bandra is pending for last seven years. Considering this fact, I pass

    following order:

                                       ORDER

    (i)         The Writ Petition is allowed.

    (ii)        Learned Metropolitan Magistrate's 32nd Court at Bandra,

                Mumbai shall decide/conclude the proceedings in CC No.

                1759/PW/2018 within one month and expedite the trial as

                early as possible, preferably within one year.

                Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.




                                                    (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                      Page 2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.