Bombay High Court
MAHARASHTRA RAJYA VANMAJUR, VAN KAMGAR THR. ITS PRESIDENTversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FOREST DEPARTMENT AND ORS.
- Disposal
- Allowed To be withdrawn
Holding
The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary
The Maharashtra Rajya Vanmajur, Van Kamgar (Petitioner) filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief, but had already approached the Labour Court on the same matter. The petitioner's counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition. The Court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the petition as withdrawn, while expressly keeping all rights and contentions of the petitioner open for future litigation. No substantive merits of the case were addressed. The order was pronounced by Judges Sharmila U. Deshmukh and Neeraj P. Dhote.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner may withdraw the writ petition after having approached the Labour Court?
Subjects
- withdrawal of petition
- writ petition
- labour court
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- procedural law
Judgment
36-WP-3309-2026.doc
Digitally signed
HARISH
by HARISH
VITHAL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
VITHAL CHAUDHARI
CHAUDHARI Date:
2026.09.09
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
18:58:23 +0530
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3309 OF 2026
Maharashtra Rajya Vanmajur, Van Kamgar
Thr. Its President ...Petitioner.
Versus
State Of Maharashtra
Thr. Principal Secretary,
Forest Department And Others ...Respondents.
——————
Mr. Kalpesh Uttam Patil a/w Digambar V. Jadhav for the Petitioner.
Mr. P. V. Nelson Rajan, AGP for the Respondent-State.
——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh &
Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
Date : September 09, 2026.
P. C. :
1. As the petitioner has already approached the Labour Court,
learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks
permission to withdraw the petition.
2. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
3. All rights and contentions are expressly kept open.
[Neeraj P. Dhote, J.] [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]
Harish 1 of 1
Checking your session…