Bombay High Court
BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONversusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court held that, having obtained all requisite statutory clearances and with no mangrove destruction, the petitioner is entitled to the permission under the 2018 PIL judgment.
Summary
The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation sought permission to construct an earthen bund and two culverts at the Kanjurmarg municipal solid waste processing site to protect mangroves by preventing leachate ingress and facilitating tidal flow. The petitioner argued that the project does not involve cutting or destroying mangroves and that all statutory clearances—including CRZ‑2019 clearance, forest NOC, and approvals from the Thane Creek Flamingo Sanctuary monitoring committee—had been obtained. Respondents raised limited objections, chiefly that part of the works fell within a CRZ‑1A area, but affirmed that the clearances were valid. The Court examined whether the project required additional forest clearance under the 1980 Van (Sanrakshan Evam Samvardhan) Adhiniyam and concluded that no mangroves were present at the site, so such clearance was unnecessary. Relying on its earlier judgment in PIL No. 87 of 2006, the Court held that the petitioner is entitled to the required permission, subject to strict compliance with all conditions of the existing clearances. Accordingly, the petition was allowed, directing the respondents to permit the construction.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to permission to construct the earthen bund and culverts under the earlier PIL judgment of 2018.
- Whether the statutory clearances obtained (CRZ‑2019, forest NOC, sanctuary approvals) are sufficient for the proposed works.
- Whether the project involves destruction or cutting of mangroves, thereby invoking the 1980 Van (Sanrakshan Evam Samvardhan) Adhiniyam.
- Whether the portion of the project falling in CRZ‑1A area requires additional environmental clearance.
Legislation cited
- Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 2019
- Van (Sanrakshan Evam Samvardhan) Adhiniyam, 1980
Subjects
- Mangrove conservation
- Coastal Regulation Zone
- Environmental clearance
- Public Interest Litigation
- Earthen bund
- Culverts
- Municipal solid waste
- Article 226
- Writ of mandamus
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3349 OF 2026
Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation .. Petitioner
Vs.
Union of India & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Saket Mone with Ms. Oorja Dhond and Ms. Anchita Nair, Advocates
for the Petitioner.
Ms. Shruti Vyas with Ms. Kavita Dhanuka, Advocates for Respondent
No.1-Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change.
Mr. Manish Kelkar with Ms. Gauri Phadake, Advocates for Respondent
No.2-MCZMA.
Smt. Jyoti Chavan, Additional Government Pleader with Smt. Nazia
Sheikh, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent Nos.3 and 4/State
of Maharashtra.
Ms. Deepali Bagla, Advocate, i/by Bagla & Associates, for Respondent
No.5-BEAG.
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, ACJ. &
GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.
DATE : 18th August, 2026.
P.C. :
1. The Petitioner proposes to undertake the construction of an
Earthen Bund and two Culverts along the waterfront at the Kanjurmarg
Municipal Solid Waste processing facility near the Eastern Express
Highway, Kanjurmarg (East), Mumbai, to facilitate a tidal water flow for
the protection and survival of mangroves. The Petitioner seeks
permission of this Court, pursuant to the judgment and order dated 17th
1/6
929-WP-3349-2026.odt Dixit
September, 2018 and 2nd November, 2018 delivered by this Court in
Public Interest Litigation No. 87 of 2006.
2. Mr. Mone, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner,
submits that the proposed project does not involve any destruction or
cutting of mangroves. He submits that the Earthen Bund is primarily
intended to prevent the ingress of untreated wastewater into the
surrounding mangrove vegetation, while the proposed Culverts are
intended to facilitate the smooth flow of tidal water into the mangrove
area. The project would also prevent soil erosion and thereby contribute
to the overall protection of the marine environment. The Bund is
proposed to be constructed using eco-friendly geo-grid reinforcement,
controlled filling of Murum (considered a ‘Minor Mineral’, which is a
weathered, fragmented rock material mixed with clay, silt and gravel,
which packs down tightly into a hard, stable surface), rock toe protection
and geo-membrane waterproofing so as to ensure its structural integrity
and long-term performance. The dimensions and other particulars of the
proposed Bund and Culverts are set out in the Petition.
3 Mr. Mone further submits that all requisite statutory
permissions and clearances have been obtained for the project. This
includes;
2/6
929-WP-3349-2026.odt Dixit
(i) Clearance granted by Respondent No. 2 on 9 th January,
2024 under the CRZ Notification, 2019;
(ii) Forest NOC dated 22nd October, 2024, issued by
Respondent No. 4 recording that no forest or mangroves
are visible at the site.
(iii) Approval granted by the Thane Creek Flamingo
Sanctuary ESZ Monitoring Committee, on 27th June,
2025 and 16th February, 2026.
It is submitted that the Petitioner has also paid all requisite charges to the
concerned statutory authorities on 12th February, 2026 and has complied
with all conditions imposed by them.
4. Respondent No. 4 has filed an affidavit dated 6th August,
2026, confirming that there are no mangroves at the site of the proposed
Earthen Bund and, therefore, clearance/approval of the Ministry of
Environment, Forests and Climate Change, Government of India, under
the Van (Sanrakshan Evam Samvardhan) Adhiniyam, 1980, is not
required. The affidavit further records that the Petitioner has complied
with the conditions imposed by the concerned authorities. Similarly,
Respondent No. 2 has also filed an affidavit dated 13th August, 2026
stating that approval for the project has been granted, subject to strict
3/6
929-WP-3349-2026.odt Dixit
compliance with the conditions stipulated in the approvals issued by the
concerned statutory authorities.
5. Mr. Kelkar, learned counsel appearing for Respondent
No. 2, submits that Respondent No. 2 supports the project proposed to be
implemented by the Petitioner.
6. Ms. Bagla, learned counsel appearing for Respondent No. 5,
opposes the Petition on the limited ground that the application made to
Respondent No. 2, contemplated the construction of two Earthen Bunds
and two Culverts, of which one Earthen Bund and both Culverts fall
within the CRZ-1A area. She, however, fairly submits that if constructed
and implemented strictly in accordance with the statutory permissions,
the project would be beneficial to the environment. In response,
Mr. Mone submits that only one Earthen Bund is now proposed to be
constructed and that the Petitioner has obtained the requisite permission
for its construction. In support, he relies upon the Clearance dated 9 th
January, 2024 granted by Respondent No.2 at page 98 of the paperbook.
7. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and
perused the record. It is not in dispute that the proposed project does not
involve the cutting or destruction of mangroves. On the contrary, the
4/6
929-WP-3349-2026.odt Dixit
material on record indicates that the proposed Earthen Bund is intended
to protect the surrounding mangrove vegetation and marine life by
preventing the ingress of ‘Leachate’ (contaminated liquid that drains
from municipal landfills, compost sites or mines, carrying toxic
chemicals, heavy metals and organic waste) into the tidal waters. The
proposed Culverts are intended to facilitate the movement of tidal water
and thereby aid in the conservation and survival of the mangroves. The
project would also serve to prevent soil erosion and protect the marine
biodiversity of the area.
8. In these circumstances, considering the nature and purpose
of the project, the statutory permissions and clearances obtained by the
Petitioner and the public utility involved, we are of the view that the
petitioner is entitled to the permission required as per the judgment and
order dated 17th September, 2018 and 2nd November, 2018 delivered by
this Court in Public Interest Litigation No. 87 of 2006.
9. This Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a),
which reads as under:
“(a) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a Writ of
Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or
direction in the nature of mandamus under Article 226
of the Constitution of India, thereby directing the
5/6
929-WP-3349-2026.odt Dixit
Respondent Authorities to permit the Petitioner to
execute the project of proposed construction of Earthen
Bund and construction of two culverts along water
front at Kanjur Municipal Solid Waste (MSW)
processing facility near Eastern Express Highway,
Kanjurmarg (E), in 'S' Ward, Mumbai Suburban,
Maharashtra ("said project") for movement of tidal
flow for surviving of mangroves, in view of the public
importance of the project finding of this Hon'ble Court
recorded at paragraph 83(viii) of the Judgment and
Order dated 17th September, 2018 passed by this
Hon'ble Court in PIL No. 87 of 2006.”
10. It is clarified that the Petitioner shall undertake and
complete the construction of the Earthen Bund and Culverts only after
obtaining all requisite statutory permissions and clearances and strictly in
accordance with the terms thereof. All such permissions and conditions
shall be scrupulously complied with throughout the execution of the
project.
[ GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J. ] [ ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ]
Digitally
signed by
SNEHA SNEHA
ABHAY DIXIT
6/6
ABHAY Date: 929-WP-3349-2026.odt Dixit
DIXIT 16:19:52
2026.08.19
+0530
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.