Bombay High Court
ARUN VITTHAL PAUDMALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
Holding
The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Arun Vitthal Paudmal, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition. The Court, after hearing the request, ordered that the petition be disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive issues were adjudicated as the petition was withdrawn before any hearing on merits. Consequently, the case was closed without any further orders.
Subjects
- withdrawal
- writ petition
- disposal
Judgment
71-WP-337-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 337 OF 2024
Arun Vitthal Paudmal ...Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents
——————
Ms. Vaishnavi R. Gaikwad i/b. Mr. Chaitanya S. Kulkarni for the Petitioner.
Mr. V. M. Mali, AGP, for the Respondents-State.
Mr. Vikram N. Walawalkar (Through VC) with Ms. Siddheshwari R. Chavan, for
the Respondent Nos.4 & 5.
Mr. Abhijit M. Adagule, for the Respondent No.6.
——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh &
Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
Date : October 08, 2026.
P. C. :
1. Mentioned out of turn.
2. The learned counsel appearing for Petitioner seeks permission to
withdraw the petition.
3. At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Petition
is disposed of as withdrawn.
[Neeraj P. Dhote, J.] [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]
Digitally
signed by
RAJU
RAJU DATTATRAYA
DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD
GAIKWAD Date:
2026.10.09
13:11:48
+0530
Gaikwad RD 1 of 1
Checking your session…