Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ARUN VITTHAL PAUDMALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Holding

The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Arun Vitthal Paudmal, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition. The Court, after hearing the request, ordered that the petition be disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive issues were adjudicated as the petition was withdrawn before any hearing on merits. Consequently, the case was closed without any further orders.

Subjects

  • withdrawal
  • writ petition
  • disposal

Judgment

                                                                                           71-WP-337-2024.doc



                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                               CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO. 337 OF 2024

                        Arun Vitthal Paudmal                                   ...Petitioner
                                  Versus
                        State of Maharashtra and Others                        ...Respondents

                                                           ——————
                        Ms. Vaishnavi R. Gaikwad i/b. Mr. Chaitanya S. Kulkarni for the Petitioner.
                        Mr. V. M. Mali, AGP, for the Respondents-State.
                        Mr. Vikram N. Walawalkar (Through VC) with Ms. Siddheshwari R. Chavan, for
                        the Respondent Nos.4 & 5.
                        Mr. Abhijit M. Adagule, for the Respondent No.6.
                                                           ——————
                                                           Coram :     Sharmila U. Deshmukh &
                                                                       Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
                                                           Date      : October 08, 2026.
                        P. C. :

                        1.        Mentioned out of turn.

                        2.        The learned counsel appearing for Petitioner seeks permission to

                        withdraw the petition.

                        3.        At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Petition

                        is disposed of as withdrawn.



                         [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.]                          [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]

           Digitally
           signed by
           RAJU
RAJU       DATTATRAYA
DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD
GAIKWAD    Date:
           2026.10.09
           13:11:48
           +0530




                        Gaikwad RD                          1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.