Bombay High Court
MAHENDALE SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN SECRETARY,versusTHE DISTRICT CASTE CERITIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE AND ORS.
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The petition was disposed of because the petitioner’s new management withdrew instructions to pursue the writ.
Summary
The petitioner, Mahendale Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, filed a writ petition challenging a decision of the District Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the institution's management had changed and the new management had no instructions to continue the litigation. The petitioner therefore sought disposal of the petition. The court considered the counsel's statement and found no substantive issue requiring adjudication. Consequently, the court disposed of the writ petition without further hearing. The order was signed by Judges Rajesh S. Patil and Abhay J. Mantri on 19 August 2026.
Subjects
- writ petition
- management change
- disposal
- court order
Judgment
901 WP-3422-2018 (C).doc
IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3422 OF 2018
Mahendale Shikshan Prasarak Mandal
Through Its Chairman Secretary, …… Petitioner
VERSUS
The District Caste Certificate Scrutiny
Committee & Ors. …… Respondents
...
Mr. Sagar Mane (Through VC) a/w Mr. Rushikesh Jagdale, Adv. Neha
Farakate i/by Adv. Ashwini Bandiwadekar, Advocates for Petitioner.
Mr. A. I. Patel, Additional Government Pleader, a/w Mr. Santosh A.
Jadhav, ‘B’ Panel Counsel AGP for Respondent Nos. 1, 5 and 6.
Adv. Suvarna Yadav (Through VC) a/w Adv. Supriya Koli, Advocates for
Respondent No. 2.
...
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL AND
ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
DATE : 19 AUGUST 2026.
P. C. :
1. Mr. Mane, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, submits
that the present Writ Petition can be disposed of in view of the change
in management. He submits that the management under which the
institution was earlier being run, and who had filed the present Petition,
has since been replaced by a completely different management. In view
thereof, he has no instructions to prosecute the present Writ Petition
any further, hence the Petition be disposed off.
Shubham 1
901 WP-3422-2018 (C).doc
2. In view of the statement made by the learned Counsel for the
Petitioner, the Petition stands disposed of.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
Digitally
signed by
TALLE
TALLE SHUBHAM
SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO
ASHOKRAO Date:
2026.08.20
14:02:52
+0530
Shubham 2
Checking your session…