Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

GRAVIT - ONSITE-JV, INDIAversusTHE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request.

Summary

The petitioner, Gravit-Onsite-JV, India, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, appearing via video conferencing, expressed the desire to withdraw the petition in favor of pursuing an alternative remedy under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The respondents' counsel raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court considered whether a petition can be withdrawn at the petitioner's request without prejudice. Finding no impediment, the Court allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioner at the hearing

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • arbitration
  • civil procedure
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                                                                   17-WP.3524.2026.doc

      Salunke
           Digitally
           signed by
           JAYANT
                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
JAYANT     VISHWANATH
VISHWANATH SALUNKE
SALUNKE    Date:
           2026.09.11
                                     ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
           11:05:13
           +0530




                                         WRIT PETITION NO. 3524 OF 2026

                        Gravit-Onsite-JV, India              }        Petitioner
                             Versus
                        The Municipal Corporation of Greater }
                        Mumbai & Anr.                        }        Respondents


                        Mr. Prabhakar Jadhav (through VC), Advocate for the Petitioner.

                        Ms. Oorja Dhond, Advocate for the Respondents.


                                     CORAM : MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, CJ. &
                                             ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.

                                     DATE     : 10th SEPTEMBER, 2026

                        P.C.:
                        1.      The learned counsel for the Petitioner, who appears through
                        Video Conferencing mode, submits that the Petitioner does not
                        desire to press the instant Petition as he is inclined to avail of the
                        alternative remedy under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,
                        1996.

                        2.      The learned counsel for the Respondents has no objection.

                        3.      In view of the above, the Writ Petition is Disposed of as
                        Withdrawn.



                             [ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.]                    [CHIEF JUSTICE]




                                                           1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.