Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MR. JAGAT KANTILAL SHAH AND ANRversusMR. ABDUL HAMID SHAIKH

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay. They failed to appear for hearing on 15 July 2026, 19 August 2026, and again on 28 August 2026 despite notices. The court observed that the petitioners appeared to have lost interest in prosecuting the petition. Accordingly, the court listed the petition for dismissal and ultimately dismissed it for non‑prosecution. The dismissal reflects the court’s inherent power to strike off proceedings where the parties do not pursue them.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioners repeatedly fail to appear?

Subjects

  • dismissal
  • non‑prosecution
  • writ petition
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • court procedure

Judgment

                       Priyanka                                                    10-WP-3527-2015.docx


                                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                                 WRIT PETITION NO.3527 OF 2015


                       Mr. Jagat Kantilal Shah & Anr                                  ...Petitioners
                                               V/s.

                       Mr. Abdul Hamid Shaikh                                        ...Respondent

                                                             ________________
                       None for the Petitioners.
          Digitally
          signed by
          PRIYANKA
                                                             ________________
PRIYANKA  MADHAVRAO
MADHAVRAO KALE
KALE      Date:
          2026.08.29
          18:17:53
                                                                        CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
          +0530


                                                                        DATED: 28 AUGUST 2026.
                       P.C.:


                       1)                On 19 August 2026 following order was passed:


                                   1.    None appears for the Petitioners. Even on 15 July 2026 none had
                                   appeared on behalf of the Petitioners. In pursuance of order dated
                                   15 July 2026 a letter has been issued to the Petitioners intimating
                                   today's date of hearing. However, today again none has appeared on
                                   behalf of Petitioners. It appears that Petitioners have lost interest in
                                   prosecuting the Petition.


                                   2.    List the Petition under caption 'for dismissal' on 28 August 2026.


                       2)                Today again, none has appeared for the Petitioners. It
                       appears that, the Petitioners have lost interest in prosecuting the
                       Petition.


                                                                 Page No.1 of 2
                                                                28 August 2026
Priyanka                                         10-WP-3527-2015.docx




3)         The Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.


                                                [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.]




                               Page No.2 of 2
                              28 August 2026


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.