Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

THAKURDHAM CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD., THROUGH ITS SECRETARY VIZ. SANJAY SHIVKUMAR SINGHversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI, THROUGH THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition was withdrawn and disposed of on the petitioners' instructions.

Summary

The petitioners, Thakurdham Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others. The petitioners intended to submit an online report based on a TAC report within a week. The Municipal Corporation indicated that any such online application would be considered on its merits. Subsequently, the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition. The Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn on the petitioners' instructions. The petitioners were informed that they could pursue any statutory remedy if an adverse order were later passed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petition may be withdrawn at the petitioners' request

Subjects

  • withdrawal
  • writ petition
  • municipal corporation
  • cooperative housing society
  • court procedure

Judgment

TRUPTI
SADANAND
BAMNE
                                                          1                 907-wp-3536-2026.odt
Digitally signed by
TRUPTI SADANAND
BAMNE
Date: 2026.08.19
11:02:20 +0530

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                                       WRIT PETITION NO. 3536 OF 2026
                      Thakurdham Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.& Anr. … Petitioners
                           versus
                      Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors.     … Respondents
                                                         ……
                      Mr.Y.S.Bhate with Mr.Viraaj Y. Bhate for the Petitioners.

                      Ms.K.H.Mastakar for the Respondent – Municipal Corporation.

                      Mr.Prashant Kamble, AGP for Respondent Nos. 6 to 8, the State.

                      Mr.Surel Shah, Senior Advocate with Ms.Minal Chandnani, Ms.Naisha
                      J.Khithani, Mr.Pradeep Khithani and Mr.Rajesh Ranglani for
                      Respondent Nos. 9 and 10.
                      Mr.Nivedan Torne, Asst. Eng. (B & F) Dept., ‘L’ Ward present in the
                      Court.
                                                     …...

                                         CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, ACJ
                                                     &
                                                 GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.

                                           DATE     : 18 AUGUST, 2026

                      P.C.:

                      1.          This matter was heard for some time.


                      2.          A pass over was granted. The learned Advocate for the

                      Petitioners submits, on instructions, that Petitioner No. 1 would tender

                      an online report in the light of the TAC report, within one week.
                                                                                      Trupti S. Bamne
                                      2                 907-wp-3536-2026.odt


3.              The learned Advocate for the Municipal Corporation

submits that if such an application is made online in accordance with the

procedure, the same would be considered on its own merits,

expeditiously.



4.              In view of the above statements, the learned Advocate for

the Petitioners, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this Petition.



5.              This Petition is, therefore, disposed off as withdrawn, on

instructions.



6.              If an adverse order is passed, the Petitioners would be at

liberty to avail of a statutory remedy as is permissible in law.




(GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.)                    (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)




                                                                   Trupti S. Bamne


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.