Bombay High Court
SUKHDEO EKNATH NIKAMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The petition may be withdrawn with the leave of the Court, and the petition is thereafter disposed.
Summary
The petitioner, Sukhdeo Eknath Nikam, filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order of the State of Maharashtra. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel, sought to withdraw the petition, stating that an alternate remedy was available to contest the order. The Court considered whether the petition could be withdrawn at this stage. The Court allowed the withdrawal with leave, emphasizing that the parties' contentions remain expressly open for any future proceedings. Consequently, the writ petition was withdrawn and disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether a criminal writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioner after filing, and if leave of the Court is required
Subjects
- withdrawal of writ petition
- alternate remedy
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
- leave of court
Judgment
250-WP-3556-2026.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3556 OF 2026
Sukhdeo Eknath Nikam …Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents
Mr. Pritesh K. Bohade, for the Petitioner.
Mr. S. S. Ghag, APP, for the Respondent-State.
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATED : 18th AUGUST 2026
PC:-
1. Mentioned out of turn at 11:00 a.m..
2. Mr. Bohade, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, on
instructions of the Petitioner, seeks withdrawal of the Writ Petition,
as there is an alternate remedy to challenge the impugned order.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn
and disposed of as such with leave as sought.
4. It is clarified that all contentions of both the parties are
expressly kept open.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
Page 1
Sonali
Checking your session…