Bombay High Court
SHOBHABAI W/O. RAJU RATHODversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The High Court held that, since the complaint was directed to be pursued as a private complaint, it could not entertain the writ and dismissed the petition.
Summary
Shobhabai, the widow of the late Raju Rathod, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction for the police to register a crime against relatives of her deceased husband who she alleged were harassing her. She had earlier lodged a report on 02-11-2019 at Pachod Police Station, but the police recorded it as a non‑cognizable case and directed her to file a private complaint before the court. The petitioner argued that the police failed to take cognizance and therefore approached the High Court. The Court observed that the complaint had already been classified as non‑cognizable and the petitioner was instructed to pursue a private complaint, leaving no scope for the superior authority to intervene. Consequently, the Court declined to grant any relief and disposed of the writ petition, directing the petitioner to file a private complaint in the appropriate court.
Issues considered
- Whether the High Court can direct the police to register an FIR when the complaint has been held non‑cognizable and the petitioner has been directed to file a private complaint.
- Whether the petitioner’s grievance of harassment constitutes a cognizable offence warranting police action.
Subjects
- harassment
- private complaint
- non‑cognizable offence
- criminal writ petition
- police inaction
- high court jurisdiction
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:40043-DB
357.20WP
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
21 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 357 OF 2020
SHOBHABAI W/O. RAJU RATHOD
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for the petitioner : Mr.V.A.Bagal
APP for Respondent-State : Mrs.U.S.Bhosale
…
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ.
DATE : 31.08.2026
P.C. :
1] Heard. The petitioner is seeking direction to
decide her complaint dated 31.12.2019 and thereafter
register crime against the concerned accused. However, on
going through the said complaint, it appears that the
petitioner is having grievance about harassment by the
relatives of her late husband. Even in the complaint, the
grievance was raised by the petitioner that on 02.11.2019
she had lodged report with the concerned Police Station i.e.
Pachod Police Station, but cognizance of the same was not
taken by the concerned police officials. However, the
petitioner herself has placed on record report of N.C. for the
incident dated 02.11.2019 wherein it is mentioned that non-
357.20WP
2
cognizable case was registered and she was directed to lodge
private complaint before the Court. Under such
circumstances, when the petitioner was already directed to
lodge private complaint against the concerned persons, there
was no occasion for the superior authority to decide the
subsequent complaint as she could have filed private
complaint before the concerned Court.
2] Under such circumstances, if the petitioner is still
facing harassment at the hands of the person from the
relatives of her late husband, then she may file private
complaint against them in the concerned court. At this stage,
we are not inclined to grant any relief to the petitioner.
Accordingly, the Criminal Writ Petition stands disposed of.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE]
JUDGE JUDGE
DDC
Checking your session…