Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

KADAM PRAVIN VYANKATRAO AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court may grant permission to withdraw a writ petition when the petitioner requests it.

Summary

The petitioners, Kadam Pravin Vyankatrao and others, filed a writ petition and a civil application against the State of Maharashtra in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Subsequently, the petitioners instructed their counsel, Mr. Sambhaji G. Munde, to withdraw the writ petition. The counsel sought the Court’s permission to effect the withdrawal. The Court examined the request and, in accordance with procedural law, granted permission for the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn and the accompanying civil application was also dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Court may grant permission to withdraw a writ petition upon the petitioner's request

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • civil procedure
  • high court order

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:36725-DB


                                                                       wp3616-26.doc
                 drp
                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                 WRIT PETITION NO.3616 OF 2026
                                              WITH
                               CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4064 OF 2026

                 Kadam Pravin Vyankatrao and Others                  PETITIONERS

                        VERSUS

                 The State of Maharashtra and Others                RESPONDENTS

                                              .......
                 Mr. Sambhaji G. Munde, Advocate for the Petitioners
                 Mr. V. M. Kagne, AGP for Respondent - State
                                               ....…

                              [CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
                                       ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. J.]

                                     DATE : 17th AUGUST, 2026

                 ORDER :

                 1.     Learned Advocate for the Petitioners has placed on record
                 copy of the written instructions received from the Petitioners,
                 instructing him to withdraw the Writ Petition. The written
                 instructions are marked “X” for the purpose of identification. He,
                 therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Petition.


                 2.     Permission is granted.


                 3.     Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Civil Application
                 is accordingly disposed of.



                 [ ABASAHEB D. SHINDE ]                  [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ]
                          JUDGE                                     JUDGE
                 drp/wp3616-26.doc


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.