Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHUBHANGI CHANDRKANT GUDEWARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The Court allowed the petition to be withdrawn and disposed of the writ petition.

Summary

Petitioner Shubhangi Chandrkant Gudewar filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner’s counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Sujal Vishwas Attavar v. State of Maharashtra (2026 SCC OnLine SC 798). The Court considered whether the petition could be withdrawn in light of the higher court’s ruling. No substantive merits of the petition were examined. The Court granted leave to withdraw and disposed of the petition as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be allowed to be withdrawn after the Supreme Court’s decision in Sujal Vishwas Attavar v. State of Maharashtra

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Supreme Court precedent

Judgment

                           sns                                              23-wp-3668-2026.doc




                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                           CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                             WRIT PETITION NO.3668 OF 2026

                      Shubhangi Chandrkant Gudewar                      … Petitioner

                               V/s.

                      State of Maharashtra & Ors.                       … Respondents



                      Mr. Shrikant Kompelli for the Petitioner.
                      Mr. Rohit P. Mahadik i/by Adv. P. Sharma for Respondent Nos.4 & 6.
                      Mr. Ganesh Sudhir Vaidya for Respondent Nos.6, 7 and 8.
                      Mr. J. B. Kadam, PSI, Nehru Nagar Police Station, Mumbai, present.


                                                       CORAM :   A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                 KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                          DATE : 28th August, 2026

                      P.C.:-

                      1)              In view of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the

                      case of Sujal Vishwas Attavar vs. State of Maharashtra reported in 2026

                      SCC OnLine SC 798, learned Advocate for the Petitioner on instructions

                      seeks leave to withdraw Petition.

                      2)              Leave granted.

                      3)              Disposed off as withdrawn.



                                 (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                  (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

         Digitally
         signed by

SUMEDH
         SUMEDH
         NAMDEO
                                                                                                  1/1
NAMDEO   SONAWANE
SONAWANE Date:
         2026.09.01
         11:14:40
         +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.