Bombay High Court
SHUBHANGI CHANDRKANT GUDEWARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Allowed To be withdrawn
Holding
The Court allowed the petition to be withdrawn and disposed of the writ petition.
Summary
Petitioner Shubhangi Chandrkant Gudewar filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner’s counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Sujal Vishwas Attavar v. State of Maharashtra (2026 SCC OnLine SC 798). The Court considered whether the petition could be withdrawn in light of the higher court’s ruling. No substantive merits of the petition were examined. The Court granted leave to withdraw and disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be allowed to be withdrawn after the Supreme Court’s decision in Sujal Vishwas Attavar v. State of Maharashtra
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
- Supreme Court precedent
Judgment
sns 23-wp-3668-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3668 OF 2026
Shubhangi Chandrkant Gudewar … Petitioner
V/s.
State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Shrikant Kompelli for the Petitioner.
Mr. Rohit P. Mahadik i/by Adv. P. Sharma for Respondent Nos.4 & 6.
Mr. Ganesh Sudhir Vaidya for Respondent Nos.6, 7 and 8.
Mr. J. B. Kadam, PSI, Nehru Nagar Police Station, Mumbai, present.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 28th August, 2026
P.C.:-
1) In view of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the
case of Sujal Vishwas Attavar vs. State of Maharashtra reported in 2026
SCC OnLine SC 798, learned Advocate for the Petitioner on instructions
seeks leave to withdraw Petition.
2) Leave granted.
3) Disposed off as withdrawn.
(KAMAL KHATA, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
Digitally
signed by
SUMEDH
SUMEDH
NAMDEO
1/1
NAMDEO SONAWANE
SONAWANE Date:
2026.09.01
11:14:40
+0530
Checking your session…