Bombay High Court
RAVINDRA KALAPPA MUTAGIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH SECRETARY AND ANR.
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The petition was dismissed as moot because the proposal under Section 37(1) of the MRTP Act had already been decided.
Summary
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging a proposal dated 12 November 2014 submitted by the Municipal Corporation under Section 37(1) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning (MRTP) Act. The High Court observed that the proposal had already been decided and therefore there was no remaining issue for adjudication. Consequently, the Court found that the petition had become moot. The petition was dismissed as there was nothing left to entertain. The judgment was delivered by Justices Rajesh S. Patil and Abhay J. Mantri on 18 August 2026.
Issues considered
- The petitioner's claim that the proposal under Section 37(1) of the MRTP Act remains pending
Legislation cited
- Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act — s. 37(1)
Subjects
- Writ Petition
- MRTP Act
- Section 37(1)
- Municipal Corporation
- Mootness
Judgment
30 - WP - 3675 - 2018 (C).docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3675 OF 2018
Ravindra Kalappa Mutagi ...Petitioner
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra, Through Secretary And Anr ...Respondents
——————
Mr. Rugwed R. Kinkar i/b. Drupad Sopan Patil, Advocate for Petitioner
Mr. Abhijit M. Adagule, Advocate for respondent-Corporation
Mr. A. I. Patel AGP a/w. Mr. A. P. Vanarase, AGP for respondent no.1-
State.
——————
Coram : RAJESH S. PATIL &
ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
Date : AUGUST 18, 2026.
P. C. :
1. Since the proposal dated 12 November 2014, submitted by the
Municipal Corporation under Section 37(1) of the MRTP Act, has already
been decided, nothing survives in the present Writ Petition.
2. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
adn 1 of 1
Checking your session…