Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VILAS BABANRAO POKHARKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH EDUCATIONAL DEPT. AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court permitted the withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to seek any appropriate remedy.

Summary

The petitioner, Vilas Babanrao Pokharkar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to pursue any other appropriate legal remedy. The Court considered the request and, after hearing both sides, allowed the withdrawal of the writ petition. It granted the petitioner liberty to approach other remedies as may be available under law. No costs were awarded against either party, and the Court expressly kept all contentions of the parties open for future reference.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn with liberty to approach other legal remedies

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • liberty to approach other remedies
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                                                                           12_WP_3682_2025.DOC



                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                           CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO.3682 OF 2025

                       Vilas Babanrao Pokharkar                                           ...Petitioner
                              Versus
                       The State Of Maharashtra
                       through Educational Dept. & Ors.                                   ...Respondents

                                                               _______

                       Mr. Nilesh Wable, for Petitioner.
                       Ms. Nisha M. Mehra, for Respondent - State.
                                                               _______

                                                     CORAM:        G. S. KULKARNI &
                                                                   DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.

                                                     DATE:         09th SEPTEMBER 2026

                       P.C.

                       1.       After hearing the petition for some time, learned Counsel for the Petitioner

                       seeks leave to withdraw the present Writ Petition, with liberty to the Petitioner to

                       take recourse to appropriate remedy as may be available in law.


                       2.       Writ Petition is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.


                       3.       No costs.


                       4.       All contentions of the parties are expressly kept open.



                       (DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J)                                    (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)


PRASAD
RAJENDRASING
RAJPUT

 Digitally signed by
 PRASAD
 RAJENDRASING
 RAJPUT
 Date: 2026.09.11
 13:50:06 +0530




                                                           Page 1 of 1
                       Prasad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.