Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAMESH PANDURANG KADAMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Holding

The petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.

Summary

The petitioner, Ramesh Pandurang Kadam, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, challenging the actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The court considered the submission and found no further cause to entertain the petition. Consequently, the bench disposed of the petition on the ground that it was infructuous. No substantive merits of the original claim were addressed, and the petition was dismissed without further orders.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • petition dismissed
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • high court

Judgment

                                                                    98-WP-369-2026.doc



               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                        CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                         CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                       WRIT PETITION NO. 369 OF 2026

Ramesh Pandurang Kadam                                   ...Petitioner
           Versus
State Of Maharashtra And Others                          ...Respondents

                                 ——————
Advocate Tejas Patil i/b Advocate Ishaan Kapse for the Petitioner
Mr. P. P. Kakade – Addl. GP a/w Mr. V. G. Badgujar – AGP for the State
                                 ——————
                                    Coram :     Sharmila U. Deshmukh &
                                                Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
                                    Date      : October 08, 2026.
P. C. :

1.         The learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner submits that

the Petition has been rendered infructuous.

2.         In view of the submission of the learned Advocate for the

Petitioner, the Petition stands disposed of as having become

infructuous.




 [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.]                           [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]




SG Punde                             1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.