Bombay High Court
RAMESH PANDURANG KADAMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Holding
The petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.
Summary
The petitioner, Ramesh Pandurang Kadam, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, challenging the actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The court considered the submission and found no further cause to entertain the petition. Consequently, the bench disposed of the petition on the ground that it was infructuous. No substantive merits of the original claim were addressed, and the petition was dismissed without further orders.
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- petition dismissed
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- high court
Judgment
98-WP-369-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 369 OF 2026
Ramesh Pandurang Kadam ...Petitioner
Versus
State Of Maharashtra And Others ...Respondents
——————
Advocate Tejas Patil i/b Advocate Ishaan Kapse for the Petitioner
Mr. P. P. Kakade – Addl. GP a/w Mr. V. G. Badgujar – AGP for the State
——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh &
Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
Date : October 08, 2026.
P. C. :
1. The learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner submits that
the Petition has been rendered infructuous.
2. In view of the submission of the learned Advocate for the
Petitioner, the Petition stands disposed of as having become
infructuous.
[Neeraj P. Dhote, J.] [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]
SG Punde 1 of 1
Checking your session…