Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ATISH MOHAN BHALSINGHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dismissed

Holding

The petition is dismissed because the petitioner has a substantive alternate remedy under Section 22P of the Maharashtra Police Act.

Summary

The petitioner, Atish Mohan Bhalsingh, filed a writ petition challenging a matter before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner claimed that the court should entertain the petition despite having a statutory avenue to address his grievance. The Court examined whether the existence of a substantive alternate remedy under Section 22P of the Maharashtra Police Act precludes the petition. It held that the petitioner is entitled to approach the Maharashtra State Police Complaints Authority under that provision. Consequently, the Court disposed of the writ petition, directing the petitioner to use the alternate statutory remedy.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be entertained when the petitioner has a substantive alternate statutory remedy under Section 22P of the Maharashtra Police Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • statutory remedy
  • Maharashtra Police Act
  • Section 22P
  • Police Complaints Authority
  • writ petition
  • High Court of Bombay

Judgment

             ssm                                                    29-wp3732.2018.doc

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                              CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                               WRIT PETITION NO. 3732 OF 2018

        Atish Mohan Bhalsingh                                       …..Petitioner

                 Vs.

        The State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                             …..Respondents

                             ____________________________________

        Mr. Harshad Inamdar for the Petitioner.
        Shri. S. V. Gavand APP, for the Respondent-State.
                          ____________________________________

                                          CORAM :        A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                         KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                DATE :   20th AUGUST, 2026.


        P.C.:-

        1)             Petitioner is having substantive alternate statutory remedy

        under Section 22P of the Maharashtra Police Act to file a complaint before

        the Maharashtra State Police Complaints Authority.

        2)             By reserving the said alternate remedy in favour of the

        Petitioner, Petition is disposed off.



                   (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                          (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
          SHARNAPPA
SANJIV    MASHALKAR
SHARNAPPA
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.08.25
          10:42:18
          +0530



                                                                                         1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.