Bombay High Court
APPASAHEB NALAWADE GADHINGLAJ TALUKA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. THRUGH CHAIRMAN SHRI. S D SHINDEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPT. OF CO-OPERATION AND ORS
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings, without adjudicating the merits.
Summary
The petitioner, Appasaheb Nalawade Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition, stating an intention to pursue appropriate alternative proceedings. The Court granted the request, ordering the petition to be disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to adopt other suitable proceedings. The judges expressly clarified that the merits of the case were not examined. Consequently, all rights and contentions of the petitioner remain open for future litigation.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue alternative proceedings
Subjects
- withdrawal of petition
- writ petition
- procedural law
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-KOL:9255-DB
8-WP-3775-2022(C).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3775 OF 2022
Appasaheb Nalawade Gadhinglaj Taluka Sahakari ...Petitioner
Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.
Through Chairman Shri. S D Shinde
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents
——————
Mr. Bhooshan R. Mandlik a/w Mr. Shivam Walekar and Ms. Sameeta Jankar, for
the Petitioner.
Ms. Tejas J. Kapre, AGP for the Respondent-State.
——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh &
Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
Date : September 28, 2026.
P. C. :
1. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner, on instructions,
seeks permission to withdraw the Petition with liberty to adopt
appropriate proceedings.
2. The Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
3. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the
matter and as such all rights and contentions are expressly kept open.
[Neeraj P. Dhote, J.] [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]
Jamadar - SL 1 of 1
Checking your session…