Bombay High Court
ATMARAM KHANDU ZARAD AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Sub Divisional Officer must decide the representation within eight weeks of receipt of the Court's order.
Summary
The petitioners, Atmaram Khandu Zarad and others, filed a writ petition challenging the non‑decision of their representation dated 01‑09‑2021 by the Sub Divisional Officer. The High Court examined whether the administrative authority was obligated to decide the representation. No substantive reasoning was recorded in the short order. The Court directed the Sub Divisional Officer to decide the representation, if not already done, within eight weeks of receiving the order. The petition was thereby disposed.
Issues considered
- What is the duty of the Sub Divisional Officer to decide the petitioners' representation dated 01‑09‑2021?
Subjects
- writ petition
- representation
- administrative law
- High Court
- order disposal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:37783-DB
{1} 7-wp-3816-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
7 WRIT PETITION NO. 3816 OF 2026
Atmaram Khandu Zarad And Others
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector And Others
...
Mr. R.J. Nirmal, Advocate for the Petitioners
Mr. B.B. Bhise, AGP for State
.......
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 19th AUGUST, 2026
PER COURT :
1. The Writ Petition is disposed of by directing Respondent No. 2-
Sub Divisional Officer to decide the representation of the Petitioners
dated 01.09.2021, if not already decided, within 08 weeks from the
date of receipt of copy of this order.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
Bhagyawant Punde
Checking your session…