Bombay High Court
DADASAHEB HAUSRAO KHEDKAR AND ORS.versusBAPU RANGNATH KHEDKAR AND ORS.
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- ABHAY S WAGHWASE
Holding
The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to approach the Hon’ble Minister.
Summary
Petitioners Dadasaheb Hausrao Khedkar and others filed a writ petition seeking relief against respondents. After the Supreme Court’s decision in Gurudassing Nawoosing Panjwani v. State of Maharashtra, the petitioners moved to withdraw the petition and asked for liberty to approach the Hon’ble Minister for a revision. The respondents raised no objection. The Court, relying on the Supreme Court precedent and the lack of opposition, allowed the withdrawal and granted the requested liberty. It directed the Minister to consider the matter within six months and ordered that any stay remain effective until a revision is filed before the Minister.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn after a Supreme Court judgment and with liberty to approach the Minister
- Whether the Court can direct the Minister to decide the revision within a specified period
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- ministerial revision
- stay
- Supreme Court precedent
- civil procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:23668
960-WP-3870-1998.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
960 WRIT PETITION NO. 3870 OF 1998
DADASAHEB HAUSRAO KHEDKAR AND ORS.
VERSUS
BAPU RANGNATH KHEDKAR AND ORS.
.…
Mr. V. P. Latange, Advocate for Petitioners
Mr. M. M. Patil – Beedkar, Advocate for Respondent No.2
Mr. N. C. Garud, Advocate for Respondent No.5
Mr. P. D. Patil, AGP for Respondent Nos. 6 and 7
.…
CORAM : ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.
DATE : June 17, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. In view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in
the case of Gurudassing Nawoosing Panjwani V. State of
Maharashtra, 2015 AIR SCW 6277 :: 2016 (1) ABR 1, learned
counsel for petitioner seeks withdrawal of this writ petition with
liberty to approach Hon’ble Minister.
2. Other side has no objection.
3. The writ petition is disposed off as withdrawn with
liberty as prayed for.
1 of 2
(( 2 )) 960-WP-3870-1998
4. The Hon’ble Minister may consider the time already
exhausted before this Court and make an endeavour to decide the
revision, preferably within six months.
5. Stay, if any, shall continue till filing of revision before the
Hon’ble Minister.
[ ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J. ]
SMS
2 of 2
Checking your session…