Bombay High Court
POPAT GANPAT DHUMALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The petition was dismissed as moot because the petitioner had already served his entire sentence.
Summary
The petitioner, Popat Ganpat Dhumal, filed a writ petition challenging certain aspects of his conviction. During the hearing, counsel informed the court that the petitioner had already been released after completing his entire sentence. The court noted that, with the petitioner no longer in custody, there was no longer any relief to be granted. Consequently, the court held that the petition was moot. The petition was therefore disposed of without any further order.
Issues considered
- What relief, if any, remains for a petitioner who has completed his sentence?
- Whether the writ petition can proceed when the petitioner is no longer in custody?
Subjects
- criminal law
- writ petition
- release
- mootness
- jurisdiction
Judgment
supriya 1 of 1 9-WP-3905-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3905 OF 2025
Popat Ganpat Dhumal ..Petitioner
SUPRIYA Versus
PRAMOD
JAWARE The State Of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents
Digitally signed by
SUPRIYA
PRAMOD JAWARE
Date: 2026.08.12
12:11:53 +0530
__________
Ms. Ankita Naik for the Petitioner.
Ms. Supriya Kak, APP for the Respondent-State.
__________
CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL &
RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, JJ.
DATE : 11 AUGUST 2026
PC :
1. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that, the
Petitioner is released from the prison after serving out his entire
sentence.
2. In view thereof, nothing further survives in the present
Petition. Accordingly, the Petition is disposed of.
(RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
Checking your session…