Bombay High Court
MONOPOLY INNOVATIONS PVT. LTD. CIN U15132MH0214PTC253906versusRESERVE BANK OD INDIA
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The court allowed the withdrawal of the writ petition and disposed of it.
Summary
Monopoly Innovations Pvt. Ltd. filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Reserve Bank of India and other respondents. After filing, the petitioner obtained an efficacious alternative remedy and sought to withdraw the petition. The petitioner’s counsel submitted a withdrawal request, which was not opposed by the respondents’ counsel. The court considered whether it could permit the withdrawal of a pending writ petition. Finding no opposition and noting the availability of an alternative remedy, the court allowed the withdrawal. Accordingly, the writ petition was disposed of on the petitioner’s request.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition pending before the High Court can be withdrawn after filing when an alternative remedy becomes available
- Whether the court may dispose of the petition on withdrawal without a substantive hearing
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- alternative remedy
- civil procedure
- high court
Judgment
25 WP 3907-24-OS.DOC
Priya Soparkar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3907 OF 2024
Monopoly Innovations Pvt. Ltd. …Petitioner
Versus
Reserve Bank of India and ors. …Respondents
Mr. Anirban Sen with Ms. Viloma Shah and Mr. S. Ghosh i/by AVP
Partners, for the Petitioner.
Ms. Huzan Bhumgara with Ms. Shubhi Dotiya i/by Desai &
Diwanji, for the Respondent No.1.
Mr. Vishwanath Mannadiar i/by Mannadiar & Co., for the
Respondent No.2.
Mr. R. L. Motwani, for the Respondent No.3.
Mr. Ajay Deshmane i/by V. Deshpande & Co., for the Respondent
No.5.
Mr. Navin Arora, for the Respondent No.6.
CORAM: SUMAN SHYAM &
GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, JJ.
DATED: 18th SEPTEMBER, 2026.
PC:-
1. Mr. Anirban Sen, learned counsel appearing for the
Petitioner submits that after filing of this Writ Petition, an
efficacious alternative remedy has become available to the
Petitioner. Therefore, the Petitioner wants to withdraw this Writ
Digitally
signed by
PRIYA PRIYA RAJESH
SOPARKAR
RAJESH Date:
SOPARKAR 2026.09.19
11:27:44
+0530 Petition to pursue alternative remedy.
Page 1 of 2
25 WP 3907-24-OS.DOC
2. The prayer is not opposed by the learned counsel appearing
for the Respondents.
3. In view of the above, this Writ Petition stands disposed of, on
withdrawal, with liberty as prayed for.
(GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.)
{
Page 2 of 2
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.