Bombay High Court
DOSTI CORPORATION - VIHARversusCOMMISSIONER OF CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI SOUTH
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as there is nothing left for consideration after the earlier appeal was allowed and remitted to CESTAT.
Summary
The petition filed by Dosti Corporation‑Vihar sought relief against the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Mumbai South. The Court noted that the same dispute had already been decided in Dosti Corporation‑Vihar v. Commissioner Service Tax‑1, Mumbai (Central Excise Appeal No.2 of 2025), where the appeal was allowed and the matter remitted to the CESTAT. Consequently, the Court held that no issue remained for adjudication in the present writ petition. Keeping the parties’ contentions open, the Court disposed of the petition as moot. The petition was therefore dismissed.
Issues considered
- The petition is maintainable after the earlier appeal has been allowed and the matter remitted to CESTAT.
Subjects
- writ petition
- jurisdiction
- remand
- CESTAT
- mootness
Judgment
Digitally
signed by
RUPALI 41-WP-3909-2026.doc
RUPALI RAJESH
RAJESH WAKODIKAR
WAKODIKAR Date:
2026.08.27
18:22:34
+0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3909 OF 2026
Dosti Corporation - Vihar ...Petitioner
Versus
The Commissioner of CGST &
Central Excise, Mumbai South ...Respondent
Mr. Bharat Raichandani a/w Mr. Mahesh Raichandani a/w Mr.
bhagrati Sahu i/b UBR Legal Advoctes for the Petitioner.
Mr. Ram Ochani a/w Ms. Niyati Mankad a/w Ms. Priyanka Sinigh for
the Respondent.
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK &
SANDESH D. PATIL JJ.
DATE : 24th AUGUST, 2026
P.C. :
1. Since the order in Dosti Corporation Vihar v/s The
Commissioner Service Tax-1, Mumbai in Central Excise Appeal No.2
of 2025 is passed by this Court on 10th September, 2025 and since
the appeal has been allowed and the matter has been remitted back
to the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT),
Wakodikar 1/2
41-WP-3909-2026.doc
nothing survives for further consideration in the present petition.
2. Keeping all contentions of the parties open, petition is
disposed of.
(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.) (M. S. KARNIK, J.)
Wakodikar 2/2
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.