Bombay High Court

SANJAY VITHALRAO JADHAVversusTHE COLLECTOR AURANGABAD AND ORS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: ABHAY S WAGHWASE

Holding

The writ petitions are held to be infructuous and are disposed of accordingly.

Summary

Three writ petitions (Nos. 752, 3929, and 764 of 2007) were filed in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Collector, Aurangabad and other respondents. Counsel for the respondents, Ms. Anagha Pandit, submitted that the petitions had become infructuous. The Court examined the submission and found no remaining cause of action. Consequently, the Court disposed of all three writ petitions as infructuous, without addressing any substantive merits.

Issues considered

Whether the writ petitions are infructuous and should be dismissed

Subjects

writ petition
infructuous
disposal
High Court of Bombay

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:24245


                                                                31-WP-752-2007++.odt




                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                              31 WRIT PETITION NO. 752 OF 2007

                                     SYED RUBABEE SYED KASAM
                                               VERSUS
                              THE COLLECTOR AURANGABAD AND ORS
                                                   .…
                 Mr. P. B. Shirsath, Advocate for Petitioner
                 Mr. P. D. Patil, AGP for Respondent – State
                 Ms Anagha Pandit h/f Mr. S. B. Talekar, Advocate for Respondent
                 No.4
                                                   .…
                                                 WITH
                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 3929 OF 2007

                                     SANJAY VITHALRAO JADHAV
                                               VERSUS
                              THE COLLECTOR AURANGABAD AND ORS
                                                   .…
                 Mr. Y. V. Kakade, Advocate for Petitioner
                 Mr. P. D. Patil, AGP for Respondent – State
                 Mr. N. J. Pahune Patil, Advocate for Respondent No.2
                 Mr. P. B. Shirsath, Advocate for Respondent No.3
                                                   .…
                                                 WITH
                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 764 OF 2007

                                    MOHSIN ABDUL KABIR BAGESH
                                               VERSUS
                             THE COLLECTOR AURANGABAD AND ORS
                                                   .…
                 Mr. P. B. Shirsath, Advocate for Petitioner
                 Mr. P. D. Patil, AGP for Respondent – State
                 Mr. N. J. Pahune Patil, Advocate for Respondent No.3
                 Ms Anagha Pandit h/f Mr. S. B. Talekar, Advocate for Respondent
                 No.4

                                                                              1 of 2
                                     (( 2 ))          31-WP-752-2007++




                                    .…

                       CORAM : ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.

                          DATE : June 22, 2026
PER COURT :-


1.             Ms. Anagha Pandit, learned counsel, makes a statement

that these petitions have become infructuous. She therefore urges that

the same be disposed off.



2.             In view of above, these writ petitions are disposed off as

infructuous.



                                       [ ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J. ]

SMS




                                                                         2 of 2

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…