Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PULIN NAVINCHANDRA KUSUMGAR THROUGH MANISH MATHURA PRASAD MISHRAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Pulin Navinchandra Kusumgar, filed writ petition No. 3944 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear at the scheduled hearing on 2 September 2026, and had also not appeared on a prior date of 12 August 2026. The court noted that the petitioner seemed uninterested in pursuing the petition. The issue before the court was whether the petition could be dismissed for non‑prosecution. Relying on procedural rules that a petition may be dismissed when the petitioner does not prosecute, the court dismissed the petition. The dismissal was entered as a final order.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non-prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                             sns                                                38-wp-3944-2026.doc




                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO.3944 OF 2026

                      Pulin Navinchandra Kusumgar                           … Petitioner

                               V/s.

                      The State of Maharashtra                              … Respondent



                      None for the Petitioner.
                      Mr. Ashish I. Satpute, APP for the Respondent-State.


                                                         CORAM :  A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                  KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                           DATE : 2nd September, 2026

                      P.C.:-

                      1)              None for Petitioner when called out for hearing.

                      2)              Record indicates that, even on earlier occasion i.e. on 12 th

                      August, 2026, none had appeared for the Petitioner.

                      2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                      Petition.

                      3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                   (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                   (A.S. GADKARI, J.)



         Digitally
         signed by

SUMEDH
NAMDEO
         SUMEDH
         NAMDEO
         SONAWANE
                                                                                                      1/1
SONAWANE Date:
         2026.09.05
         10:39:57
         +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.