Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SUNIL SANTOSH WARUDE AND ANRversusTHE DISTRICT COLLECTOR DHULE AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the relief sought could no longer be granted.

Summary

Sunil Santosh Warude and another filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the actions of the District Collector, Dhule. The petitioners were represented by Mr A.R. Syed, appearing on behalf of Mr S.B. Akhade. During the pendency of the proceedings, subsequent events occurred that made the relief sought by the petitioners moot. The Court held that because the subject matter of the petition had become infructuous, there was no longer any ground to entertain the writ. Accordingly, the petition was disposed of as infructuous without addressing any substantive legal issues.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • Article 226
  • infructuous
  • dismissal
  • High Court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:39670-DB


                                                   {1}                    8-wp-3971-2026

                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                            BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                      8 WRIT PETITION NO. 3971 OF 2026

                                Sunil Santosh Warude And Another
                                              VERSUS
                              The District Collector Dhule And Others
                                                  ...
              Mr. A.R. Syed h/f Mr. S.B. Akhade, Advocate for the Petitioners
              Ms. Neha Kamble, AGP for State
                                                .......

                                          CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                   ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.


                                             DATE : 31st AUGUST, 2026
              PER COURT :

              .        Due to subsequent events, writ petition is rendered infructuous.

              The same is therefore disposed of as such.



              (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.)                   (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)




              Bhagyawant Punde


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.