Bombay High Court
SUNIL SANTOSH WARUDE AND ANRversusTHE DISTRICT COLLECTOR DHULE AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the relief sought could no longer be granted.
Summary
Sunil Santosh Warude and another filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the actions of the District Collector, Dhule. The petitioners were represented by Mr A.R. Syed, appearing on behalf of Mr S.B. Akhade. During the pendency of the proceedings, subsequent events occurred that made the relief sought by the petitioners moot. The Court held that because the subject matter of the petition had become infructuous, there was no longer any ground to entertain the writ. Accordingly, the petition was disposed of as infructuous without addressing any substantive legal issues.
Subjects
- writ petition
- Article 226
- infructuous
- dismissal
- High Court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:39670-DB
{1} 8-wp-3971-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
8 WRIT PETITION NO. 3971 OF 2026
Sunil Santosh Warude And Another
VERSUS
The District Collector Dhule And Others
...
Mr. A.R. Syed h/f Mr. S.B. Akhade, Advocate for the Petitioners
Ms. Neha Kamble, AGP for State
.......
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 31st AUGUST, 2026
PER COURT :
. Due to subsequent events, writ petition is rendered infructuous.
The same is therefore disposed of as such.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
Bhagyawant Punde
Checking your session…