Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SACHIN TUKARAM PATILversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition and disposed of it as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Sachin Tukaram Patil, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging a charge-sheet that had been filed and was under scrutiny before the Additional District Sessions Judge, Pune. The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition while preserving all of his substantive contentions for future litigation. The learned counsel for the State opposed the withdrawal, but the petitioner reiterated his desire to withdraw the petition. The Court, after hearing both sides, exercised its discretion to permit the withdrawal of the petition. Consequently, the petition was formally withdrawn and disposed of as such.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition challenging a charge-sheet may be withdrawn by the petitioner while retaining the underlying substantive contentions for future proceedings

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • charge-sheet
  • High Court

Judgment

                                                                                        24.WP.3973.2025.doc

      HARSHADA H. SAWANT
            (P.A.)
                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                                WRIT PETITION NO.3973 OF 2025

                    Sachin Tukaram Patil                             .. Petitioner
                               Versus
                    The State of Maharashtra and Anr.                .. Respondents
                                                ....................
                     Ms. Sneha G. Sanap, Advocates for Petitioner.
                     Mr. Sukanta A. Karmakar, APP for Respondent No.1 – State.
                     PSI – Mukesh Gaikwad, Nigdi Police Station, Pimpri – Chinchwad.
                                                           ...................

                                                          CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                                          DATE          : SEPTEMBER 01, 2026
                    P.C.:

                    1.               Heard Ms. Sanap, learned Advocate for Petitioner and Mr.

                    Karmakar, learned APP for Respondent No.1 – State.


                    2.               Since the charge-sheet has been filed and same has been

                    challenged before the Additional District Sessions Judge, Pune,

                    Petitioner desires to withdraw the present Petition by keeping all

                    contentions of Petitioner alive and as available to the Petitioner in

                    accordance with law.


                    3.               Reserving the above liberty, Petition is allowed to be

                    withdrawn.


                    4.               Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.



H. H. SAWANT                                                               [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

                             Digitally signed
                             by HARSHADA
                    HARSHADA HANUMANT
                    HANUMANT SAWANT
                    SAWANT   Date:
                             2026.09.01
                                                                                                    1 of 1
                             15:15:29 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.