Bombay High Court
KUNAL SARJERAO GHORPADE (HUF) PROP OF R K INNOVATIONSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
- Disposal
- Disposed off as Withdrawn
Holding
The Court granted leave to withdraw the petition, resulting in its disposal.
Summary
The petitioner, Kunal Sarjerao Ghorpade, proprietor of R K Innovations, filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 400 of 2024 seeking a writ to quash the judgment dated 12-10-2022 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ichalkaranji. The petition alleged that the impugned judgment was erroneous and requested the High Court to set it aside. After hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Mr. Piyush Toshnival, applied for leave to withdraw the petition, a request that was not opposed by the respondent's counsel, Mr. C.D. Mali. The Court, after considering the application, granted leave to withdraw the petition. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether a criminal writ petition seeking quash of a lower court judgment can be withdrawn at the petitioner's request.
Subjects
- criminal writ petition
- withdrawal of petition
- quash judgment
- High Court
- appellate jurisdiction
Judgment
5 - CR WP - 400 - 2024.docx
VAIBHAV
RAMESH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
JADHAV
Digitally signed by
VAIBHAV RAMESH
JADHAV
Date: 2026.09.02
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
19:34:45 +0530
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 400 OF 2024
Kunal Sarjerao Ghorpade (H.U.F.)
Proprietor of R K Innovations … Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Piyush Toshnival (through V.C.) for the Petitioner.
Mr. C.D. Mali, APP for the State.
CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
DATED : SEPTEMBER 1, 2026
P.C.:
1. By the present Petition, the Petitioner has sought for the following
substantive relief:
“(b) This Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue appropriate Writ, Order and/or
Direction and thereby quash and set aside the impugned judgment & order
dt.12/10/2022 passed by the Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, Ichalkaranji in
Criminal Revision Application No.18 of 2021.”
2. After having heard the matter for some time, Mr. Piyush
Toshnival, learned Advocate for the Petitioner, sought a pass over to
take instructions from the Petitioner. At the request of Mr. Piyush
Toshnival, learned Advocate for the Petitioner, the Petition was taken up
after some time.
VRJ 1
5 - CR WP - 400 - 2024.docx
3. Mr. Piyush Toshnival, learned Advocate for the Petitioner, on
instructions from the Petitioner, seeks leave to simpliciter withdraw the
present Petition. This request is not opposed by Mr. C.D. Mali, learned
APP for the State.
4. In view of the statement made by Mr. Piyush Toshnival, learned
Advocate for the Petitioner, leave is granted to withdraw the present
Petition.
5. Writ Petition No. 400 of 2024 stands disposed of as withdrawn.
(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)
VRJ 2
Checking your session…